Featured Articles

Call for Papers: Improving Outcomes in Cancer Surgery

BJS will publish an additional special issue in January 2013 entitled 'Improving outcomes in cancer surgery'.   We are keen to emphasise the role that surgery plays in the management of the cancer patient. Readers who would like to offer material for this issue should prepare papers in the standard BJS style, and submit them to the Journal before 1st June 2012. The papers will be managed via the BJS electronic manuscript handling system, and will be subject to standard peer review. PLEASE STATE YOUR MANUSCRIPT SHOULD BE CONSIDERED FOR THE SUPPLEMENT.

thumbnail image: Call for Papers: Improving Outcomes in Cancer Surgery

Snapshots in Surgery Quiz

Snapshots should now be accompanied by a short question that might be general (e.g. what is this condition, and how should it be treated?), or multiple choice.  The authors must also provide the answers to the quiz using text of no more than 100 words.  For full details please go to Instructions to Authors, section 2g.

thumbnail image: Snapshots in Surgery Quiz

Clinical Library

Additional online material, supplementary to papers published in the Journal, can be found here. Whether you’re looking for podcasts, technical videos, or the archive of Snapshots in Surgery, the Clinical Library is the place to go.

thumbnail image: Clinical Library

Your Views

Interact with your colleagues: read their thoughts on articles published in BJS, submit your own opinions, debate and discuss. Join in the conversation now at Your Views.

thumbnail image: Your Views

Joint Editors-in-Chief request for determination regarding papers published by Dr Yoshitaka Fujii

The journal Anaesthesia has published a manuscript by J. B. Carlisle that appears to present overwhelming evidence that the distributions of many variables reported by Dr Yoshitaka Fujii in 168 published trials could not have occurred by chance.  The article can be read here.  Please note that, while the title of the paper states 169 papers, there is one duplicated reference, so the actual number of papers analysed in the manuscript is 168.

BJS has published one of these articles and the European Journal of Surgery, which was taken over by BJS in 2003, published two of these articles.

A letter signed by a number of affected Editors-in-Chief has been sent to the institutions in which Dr Fujii carried out his research.  The letter can be read here.  A statement from the University of Toho, Japan, at which Dr Fujii most recently worked, can be viewed here.  He has been dismissed from post.

We intend to retract the three manuscripts based on the evidence of fraud demonstrated in the analysis by Mr Carlisle.  However, before any retraction is made we are offering institutions the opportunity to attest to the integrity of any manuscript produced under their auspices.


The May 2012 issue is now available online featuring five articles on abdominal aortic aneurysm

This issue carries five articles on the subject of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) as well as a podcast featuring discussions with Professor Janet Powell of Imperial College, London and Mr Jonothan Earnshaw, Director of the NHS AAA Screening Programme in England. 

The first article discussed is Explaining the decrease in mortality for abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture by A. Anjum, R. von Allmen, R. Greenhalgh and J.T. Powell.  Br J Surg 2012; 98: 637-647.  This can be read here.

The second article is Meta-analysis of individual patient data to examine factors affecting growth and rupture of small abdominal aortic aneuryms by M.J. Sweeting, S.G. Thompson, L.C. Brown and J.T. Powell on behalf of the RESCAN collaborators.  Br J Surg 2012; 98: 655-665.  This can be read here.

Mr Earnshaw goes on to describe the work of the NHS AAA Screening Programme in England as well as the three other articles on the subject included in the issue:

1. Regional variation in the incidence of abdominal aortic aneurysm in Sweden.  R. Hulten, J. Forsberg, L. Alfredsson, J. Swedenborg and K. Leander.  Br J Surg 2012; 98: 647-653.

2. Provider volume and long-term outcome after elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.  P.J.E. Holt, A. Karthikesalingam, D. Hofman, J.D. Poloniecki, R.J. Hinchliffe, I.M. Loftus and M.M. Thompson.  Br J Surg 2012; 98: 666-672.

3. Evaluation of five risk prediction models for elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair using the UK National Vascular database.  S.W. Grant, A.D. Grayson, D.C. Mitchell and C.N. McCollum.  Br J Surg 2012; 98: 673-679.


BJS on Twitter

Follow us on Twitter to stay up-to-date with the latest Journal news.

Advertisements