Action observation for sensorimotor learning in surgery. BJS 2018; 105: 1713-1720.
Published: 27th September 2018
Authors: D. J. Harris, S. J. Vine, M. R. Wilson, J. S. McGrath, M.‐E. LeBel, G. Buckingham et al.
Acquiring new motor skills to learn complex movements and master the use of a diverse range of instruments is fundamental for developing expertise in surgery. Although aspects of skill development occur through trial and error, watching the performance of another individual (action observation) is an increasingly important adjunct for the acquisition of these complex skills before performing a procedure. The aim of this review was to examine the evidence in support of the use of action observation in surgery.
A narrative review of observational learning for surgical motor skills was undertaken. Searches of PubMed and PsycINFO databases were performed using the terms ‘observational learning’ OR ‘action observation’ AND ‘motor learning’ OR ‘skill learning’.
Factors such as the structure of physical practice, the skill level of the demonstrator and the use of feedback were all found to be important moderators of the effectiveness of observational learning. In particular, observation of both expert and novice performance, cueing attention to key features of the task, and watching the eye movements of expert surgeons were all found to enhance the effectiveness of observation. It was unclear, however, whether repeated observations were beneficial for skill learning. The evidence suggests that these methods can be employed to enhance surgical training curricula.
Observational learning is an effective method for learning surgical skills. An improved understanding of observational learning may further inform the refinement and use of these methods in contemporary surgical training curricula.Full text
You may also be interested in
Time to calcitonin normalization after surgery for node‐negative and node‐positive medullary thyroid cancer.
Authors: A. Machens, K. Lorenz, H. Dralle
Notes: Sensitive as prognostic tool
Authors: R. Miller, J. C. R. Wormald, R. G. Wade, D. P. Collins
Contralateral surgery in patients scheduled for total thyroidectomy with initial loss or absence of signal during neural monitoring.
Authors: A. Sitges‐Serra, L. Gallego‐Otaegui, J. Fontané, L. Trillo, L. Lorente‐Poch, J. Sancho et al.
Authors: L. M. Almond, F. Tirotta, H. Tattersall, J. Hodson, T. Cascella, M. Barisella et al.
Notes: Weak for liposarcoma
Systematic review to assess the possibility of return of cerebral and cardiac activity after normothermic regional perfusion for donors after circulatory death. BJS 2019; 106: 174-180.
Authors: I. M. Shapey, A. Summers, T. Augustine, D. van Dellen
Surgical training programmes in the South Pacific, Papua New Guinea and Timor Leste. BJS 2019; 106: e53-e61.
Authors: D. A. Watters, E. McCaig, S. Nagra, I. Kevau
Authors: A. Wladis, N. Roy, J. Löfgren
Prevalence and predictors of surgical‐site infection after caesarean section at a rural district hospital in Rwanda. BJS 2019; 106: e121-e128.
Authors: T. Nkurunziza, F. Kateera, K. Sonderman, M. Gruendl, E. Nihiwacu, B. Ramadhan et al.
Authors: K. R. Iverson, K. Garringer, O. Ahearn, S. Alidina, I. Citron, S. Esseye et al.
Notes: Much to be done still
Evaluation of a surgical training programme for clinical officers in Malawi. BJS 2019; 106: e156-e165.
Authors: J. Gajewski, E. Borgstein, L. Bijlmakers, G. Mwapasa, Z. Aljohani, C. Pittalis et al.