Clinical assessment to determine the risk of bowel cancer using Symptoms, Age, Mass and Iron deficiency anaemia (SAMI).
Published: 21st June 2017
Authors: M. R. Thompson, D. P. O'Leary, K. Flashman, A. Asiimwe, B. G. Ellis, A. Senapati et al.
The aim of this study was to identify characteristics with independent predictive value for bowel cancer for use in the clinical assessment of patients attending colorectal outpatient clinics.
This was a 22‐year (1986–2007) retrospective cohort analysis of data collected prospectively from patients who attended colorectal surgical outpatient clinics in Portsmouth. The data set was split randomly into two groups of patients to generate and validate a predictive model. Multivariable logistic regression was used to create and validate a system to predict outcome. Receiver operating characteristic (
Data from 29 005 patients were analysed. Discrimination of the model for bowel cancer was high in the development (C‐statistic 0·87, 95 per cent c.i. 0·85 to 0·88) and validation (C‐statistic 0·86, 0·84 to 0·87) groups. The most important co‐variables in the final model were: age (
A clinical assessment that systematically identifies or excludes four symptom–age combinations, a mass and
You may also be interested in
One‐year results of the SCANDIV randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic lavage versus primary resection for acute perforated diverticulitis.
Authors: J. K. Schultz, C. Wallon, L. Blecic, H. M. Forsmo, J. Folkesson, P. Buchwald et al.
Notes: Fewer stomas with lavage
Meta‐analysis of hybrid natural‐orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery versus laparoscopic surgery. BJS 2017; 104: 977-989.
Authors: D. C. Steinemann, P. C. Müller, P. Probst, A.‐C. Schwarz, M. W. Büchler, B. P. Müller‐Stich et al.
Notes: Less pain was the only gain
Cost‐effectiveness of high‐sensitivity faecal immunochemical test and colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer.
Authors: M. Aronsson, P. Carlsson, L.‐Å. Levin, J. Hager, R. Hultcrantz
Notes: Once only or repeat colonoscopy most effective?
Population‐based study to re‐evaluate optimal lymph node yield in colonic cancer. BJS 2017; 104: 1087-1096.
Authors: J. C. Del Paggio, Y. Peng, X. Wei, S. Nanji, P. H. MacDonald, C. Krishnan Nair et al.
Notes: Twelve is not the magic number
Randomized clinical trial
Randomized clinical trial comparing collagen plug and advancement flap for trans‐sphincteric anal fistula.
Authors: J. Bondi, J. Avdagic, U. Karlbom, O. Hallböök, D. Kalman, J. Šaltytė Benth et al.
Notes: Plug inferior to flap
Randomized clinical trial
Randomized clinical trial of biodegradeable intraluminal sheath to prevent anastomotic leak after stapled colorectal anastomosis. BJS 2017; 104: 1010-1019.
Authors: I. S. Bakker, A. N. Morks, H. O. ten Cate Hoedemaker, J. G. M. Burgerhof, H. G. Leuvenink, J. B. van Praagh et al.
Notes: Not effective
Systematic review of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced peritoneal carcinomatosis. BJS 2017; 104: 669-678.
Authors: F. Grass, A. Vuagniaux, H. Teixeira‐Farinha, K. Lehmann, N. Demartines, M. Hübner et al.
Notes: Shows promise
Authors: J. Toh, P. H. Chapuis, L. Bokey, C. Chan, K. J. Spring, O. F. Dent et al.
Population‐based study demonstrating an increase in colorectal cancer in young patients. BJS 2017; 104: 1063-1068.
Authors: J. Gandhi, C. Davidson, C. Hall, J. Pearson, T. Eglinton, C. Wakeman et al.
Notes: Worrying trends in the under 50s
Authors: A. Dohan, C. Hoeffel, P. Soyer, A. S. Jannot, P.‐J. Valette, A. Thivolet et al.
Notes: Combination useful
Authors: C. J. Verberne, Z. Zhan, E. R. van den Heuvel, F. Oppers, A. M. de Jong, I. Grossmann et al.
Notes: Intensive follow‐up no effect on survival
Systematic review of the role of biomarkers in diagnosing anastomotic leakage following colorectal surgery. BJS 2017; 104: 503-512.
Authors: B. U. Su'a, H. L. Mikaere, J. L. Rahiri, I. B. Bissett, A. G. Hill
Notes: Limited value over clinical judgement