#colorectalsurgery. BJS 2017; 104: 1470-1476.
Published: 7th September 2017
Authors: R. R. W. Brady, S. J. Chapman, S. Atallah, M. Chand, J. Mayol, A. M. Lacy et al.
The use of social media platforms among healthcare professionals is increasing. A Twitter social media campaign promoting the hashtag #colorectalsurgery was launched with the aim of providing a specialty‐specific forum to collate discussions and science relevant to an engaged, global community of coloproctologists. This article reviews initial experiences of the early adoption, engagement and utilization of this pilot initiative.
The hashtag #colorectalsurgery was promoted via the online microblogging service Twitter across a 180‐day interval. Data on all tweets containing the #colorectalsurgery hashtag were analysed using online analytical tools. Data included total number of tweets, number of views, and user engagement since registration and launch of the campaign. Content of tweet and user demographic analysis was undertaken.
The number of tweets using #colorectalsurgery grew rapidly following the launch on 24 April 2016; #colorectalsurgery was used in 15 708 tweets, which resulted in 65 398 696 impressions and involved 1863 individual Twitter accounts. Increased volumes of #colorectalsurgery tweets were noted in association with the timing of three major international colorectal surgical conferences, and geographical trends were noted. Some 88·4 per cent of all posts were by male users. The top 25 users by volume of #colorectalsurgery tweets had considerable influence and posted 8023 tweets (51·1 per cent).
Online global communities formed via healthcare‐related hashtags, such as #colorectalsurgery, unify social media posts, scientists, surgeons and authors who have an interest in coloproctology. Furthermore, they facilitate greater connectivity among geographically separate users.Read more
You may also be interested in
Authors: L. Escal, S. Nougaret, B. Guiu, M. M. Bertrand, H. de Forges, R. Tetreau et al.
Notes: Imaging criteria predict surgical difficulty
Meta‐analysis of outcomes following resection of the primary tumour in patients presenting with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Authors: U. Nitsche, C. Stöß, L. Stecher, D. Wilhelm, H. Friess, G. O. Ceyhan et al.
Notes: Selected patients only
Population‐based study of factors predicting treatment intention in patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer. BJS 2017; 104: 1866-1873.
Authors: K. Westberg, G. Palmer, F. Hjern, C. Nordenvall, H. Johansson, T. Holm et al.
Notes: Defines good selection criteria
Outcome after restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch–anal anastomosis in children and adults. BJS 2017; 104: 1640-1647.
Authors: K. Diederen, S. S. Sahami, M. M. Tabbers, M. A. Benninga, A. Kindermann, P. J. Tanis et al.
Notes: Comparable in children and adults
Weekend admission and mortality for gastrointestinal disorders across England and Wales. BJS 2017; 104: 1723-1734.
Authors: S. E. Roberts, T. H. Brown, K. Thorne, R. A. Lyons, A. Akbari, D. J. Napier et al.
Notes: Worst for gastrointestinal cancer and liver disease
Randomized clinical trial
Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic ultrasonography before laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection. BJS 2017; 104: 1462-1469.
Authors: S. B. Ellebæk, C. W. Fristrup, C. Hovendal, N. Qvist, L. Bundgaard, S. Salomon et al.
Notes: No additional benefit
Authors: K. Sahnan, A. Askari, S. O. Adegbola, P. J. Tozer, R. K. S. Phillips, A. Hart et al.
Notes: Women more likely to develop fistula
Short‐ and medium‐term outcomes following primary ileocaecal resection for Crohn’s disease in two specialist centres. BJS 2017; 104: 1713-1722.
Authors: A. de Buck van Overstraeten, E. J. Eshuis, S. Vermeire, G. Van Assche, M. Ferrante, G. R. D'Haens et al.
Notes: Clear margins and smoking cessation are key
Randomized clinical trial
Randomized clinical trial of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus sham electrical stimulation in patients with faecal incontinence. BJS 2017; 104: 1167-1176.
Authors: A. A. van der Wilt, G. Giuliani, C. Kubis, B. P. W. van Wunnik, I. Ferreira, S. O. Breukink et al.
Notes: Limited case for PTNS
Clinical assessment to determine the risk of bowel cancer using Symptoms, Age, Mass and Iron deficiency anaemia (SAMI). BJS 2017; 104: 1393-1404.
Authors: M. R. Thompson, D. P. O'Leary, K. Flashman, A. Asiimwe, B. G. Ellis, A. Senapati et al.
Notes: Can define high risk
One‐year results of the SCANDIV randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic lavage versus primary resection for acute perforated diverticulitis. BJS 2017; 104: 1382-1392.
Authors: J. K. Schultz, C. Wallon, L. Blecic, H. M. Forsmo, J. Folkesson, P. Buchwald et al.
Notes: Fewer stomas with lavage
Meta‐analysis of hybrid natural‐orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery versus laparoscopic surgery. BJS 2017; 104: 977-989.
Authors: D. C. Steinemann, P. C. Müller, P. Probst, A.‐C. Schwarz, M. W. Büchler, B. P. Müller‐Stich et al.
Notes: Less pain was the only gain