Cost‐effectiveness of groin hernia repair from a randomized clinical trial comparing commercial versus low‐cost mesh in a low‐income country. BJS 2017; 104: 695-703.
Published: 16th February 2017
Authors: J. Löfgren, A. Matovu, A. Wladis, C. Ibingira, P. Nordin, E. Galiwango et al.
Over 200 million people worldwide live with groin hernia and 20 million are operated on each year. In resource‐scarce settings, the superior surgical technique using a synthetic mesh is not affordable. A low‐cost alternative is needed. The objective of this study was to calculate and compare costs and cost‐effectiveness of inguinal hernia mesh repair using a low‐cost
This is a cost‐effectiveness analysis of a double‐blinded
The cost difference resulting from the choice of mesh was $124·7 (€118·1). In the low‐cost mesh group, the cost per
Repair using both meshes was highly cost‐effective in the study setting. A potential cost reduction of over $120 (nearly €120) per operation with use of the low‐cost mesh is important if the mesh technique is to be made available to the many millions of patients in countries with limited resources. Trial registration number:
You may also be interested in
Meta‐analysis comparing upfront surgery with neoadjuvant treatment in patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.
Authors: E. Versteijne, J. A. Vogel, M. G. Besselink, O. R. C. Busch, J. W. Wilmink, J. G. Daams et al.
Notes: Improved survival with neoadjuvant
Authors: F. P. Prete, T. Abdel‐Aziz, C. Morkane, C. Brain, T. R. Kurzawinski, P. Hindmarsh et al.
Notes: Centralization needed
Authors: M. Mansourati, V. Kumar, M. Khajanchi, M. L. Saha, S. Dharap, R. Seger et al.
Notes: High burden of late mortality
Meta‐analysis evaluating music interventions for anxiety and pain in surgery. BJS 2018; 105: 773-783.
Authors: A. Y. R. Kühlmann, A. de Rooij, L. F. Kroese, M. van Dijk, M. G. M. Hunink, J. Jeekel et al.
Prognostic significance of gross extrathyroidal extension invading only strap muscles in differentiated thyroid carcinoma.
Authors: S. Y. Park, H. I. Kim, J.‐H. Kim, J. S. Kim, Y. L. Oh, S. W. Kim et al.
Notes: None for survival
Authors: M. Almquist, K. Ivarsson, E. Nordenström, A. Bergenfelz
Notes: Higher than expected
Authors: A. L. van den Boom, E. M. L. de Wijkerslooth, K. A. L. Mauff, I. Dawson, C. C. van Rossem, B. R. Toorenvliet et al.
Development and evaluation of a patient‐centred measurement tool for surgeons’ non‐technical skills. BJS 2018; 105: 876-884.
Authors: J. Yule, K. Hill, S. Yule
Notes: Valid and reliable
Authors: S. Pengelly, J. E. A. Berry, S. E. Herrick, D. M. Bowley, G. L. Carlson
Notes: Most closed; hernia rates similar to primary closure
Postconditioning effects of argon or xenon on early graft function in a porcine model of kidney autotransplantation.
Authors: J. De Deken, S. Rex, E. Lerut, W. Martinet, D. Monbaliu, J. Pirenne et al.
Notes: No for noble gases