Development and evaluation of a patient‐centred measurement tool for surgeons’ non‐technical skills. BJS 2018; 105: 876-884.
Published: 6th April 2018
Authors: J. Yule, K. Hill, S. Yule
Non‐technical skills are essential for safe and effective surgery. Several tools to assess surgeons' non‐technical skills from the clinician's perspective have been developed. However, a reliable measurement tool using a patient‐centred approach does not currently exist. The aim of this study was to translate the existing Non‐Technical Skills for Surgeons (NOTSS) tool into a patient‐centred evaluation tool.
Data were gathered from four cohorts of patients using an iterative four‐stage mixed‐methods research design. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed to establish the psychometric properties of the tool, focusing on validity, reliability, usability and parsimony.
Some 534 patients were recruited to the study. A total of 24 patient‐centred non‐technical skill items were developed in stage 1, and reduced to nine items in stage 2 using exploratory factor analysis. In stage 3, confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated that these nine items each loaded on to one of three factors, with excellent internal consistency: decision‐making, leadership, and communication and teamwork. In stage 4, validity testing established that the new tool was independent of physician empathy and predictive of surgical quality. Surgical leadership emerged as the most dominant skill that patients could recognize and evaluate.
A novel nine‐item assessment tool has been developed. The Patients' Evaluation of Non‐Technical Skills (PENTS) tool allows valid and reliable measurement of surgeons' non‐technical skills from the patient perspective.Full text
You may also be interested in
Time to calcitonin normalization after surgery for node‐negative and node‐positive medullary thyroid cancer.
Authors: A. Machens, K. Lorenz, H. Dralle
Notes: Sensitive as prognostic tool
Authors: R. Miller, J. C. R. Wormald, R. G. Wade, D. P. Collins
Contralateral surgery in patients scheduled for total thyroidectomy with initial loss or absence of signal during neural monitoring.
Authors: A. Sitges‐Serra, L. Gallego‐Otaegui, J. Fontané, L. Trillo, L. Lorente‐Poch, J. Sancho et al.
Authors: L. M. Almond, F. Tirotta, H. Tattersall, J. Hodson, T. Cascella, M. Barisella et al.
Notes: Weak for liposarcoma
Systematic review to assess the possibility of return of cerebral and cardiac activity after normothermic regional perfusion for donors after circulatory death. BJS 2019; 106: 174-180.
Authors: I. M. Shapey, A. Summers, T. Augustine, D. van Dellen
Surgical training programmes in the South Pacific, Papua New Guinea and Timor Leste. BJS 2019; 106: e53-e61.
Authors: D. A. Watters, E. McCaig, S. Nagra, I. Kevau
Authors: A. Wladis, N. Roy, J. Löfgren
Prevalence and predictors of surgical‐site infection after caesarean section at a rural district hospital in Rwanda. BJS 2019; 106: e121-e128.
Authors: T. Nkurunziza, F. Kateera, K. Sonderman, M. Gruendl, E. Nihiwacu, B. Ramadhan et al.
Authors: K. R. Iverson, K. Garringer, O. Ahearn, S. Alidina, I. Citron, S. Esseye et al.
Notes: Much to be done still
Evaluation of a surgical training programme for clinical officers in Malawi. BJS 2019; 106: e156-e165.
Authors: J. Gajewski, E. Borgstein, L. Bijlmakers, G. Mwapasa, Z. Aljohani, C. Pittalis et al.