Development and evaluation of a patient‐centred measurement tool for surgeons’ non‐technical skills. BJS 2018; 105: 876-884.
Published: 6th April 2018
Authors: J. Yule, K. Hill, S. Yule
Non‐technical skills are essential for safe and effective surgery. Several tools to assess surgeons' non‐technical skills from the clinician's perspective have been developed. However, a reliable measurement tool using a patient‐centred approach does not currently exist. The aim of this study was to translate the existing Non‐Technical Skills for Surgeons (NOTSS) tool into a patient‐centred evaluation tool.
Data were gathered from four cohorts of patients using an iterative four‐stage mixed‐methods research design. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed to establish the psychometric properties of the tool, focusing on validity, reliability, usability and parsimony.
Some 534 patients were recruited to the study. A total of 24 patient‐centred non‐technical skill items were developed in stage 1, and reduced to nine items in stage 2 using exploratory factor analysis. In stage 3, confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated that these nine items each loaded on to one of three factors, with excellent internal consistency: decision‐making, leadership, and communication and teamwork. In stage 4, validity testing established that the new tool was independent of physician empathy and predictive of surgical quality. Surgical leadership emerged as the most dominant skill that patients could recognize and evaluate.
A novel nine‐item assessment tool has been developed. The Patients' Evaluation of Non‐Technical Skills (PENTS) tool allows valid and reliable measurement of surgeons' non‐technical skills from the patient perspective.Full text
You may also be interested in
Authors: K. Søreide, D. C. Winter
Authors: S. Wiig, C. Macrae
Authors: F. Dossa, N. N. Baxter
Authors: S. M. L. de Mik, F. E. Stubenrouch, R. Balm, D. T. Ubbink
Notes: Heterogeneous data
Authors: M. L. Nicholson, C. Yong, P. B. Trotter, L. Grant, S. A. Hosgood
Notes: Rare, but predictable
Meta‐analysis of the influence of lifestyle changes for preoperative weight loss on surgical outcomes.
Authors: M. Roman, A. Monaghan, G. F. Serraino, D. Miller, S. Pathak, F. Lai et al.
Notes: Possible but how much is enough?
Multicentre cohort study of antihypertensive and lipid‐lowering therapy cessation after bariatric surgery.
Authors: J. Thereaux, T. Lesuffleur, S. Czernichow, A. Basdevant, S. Msika, D. Nocca et al.
Notes: Better than controls
Authors: M. S. de Vos, J. F. Hamming
Development and validation of a nomogram to predict recurrence and melanoma‐specific mortality in patients with negative sentinel lymph nodes.
Authors: D. Verver, D. van Klaveren, V. Franke, A. C. J. van Akkooi, P. Rutkowski, U. Keilholz et al.
Notes: Could personalize care