Growing research in global surgery with an eye towards equity. BJS 2019; 106: e151-e155.
Published: 8th January 2019
Authors: B. L. Hedt‐Gauthier, R. Riviello, T. Nkurunziza, F. Kateera
Global surgery research is often generated through collaborative partnerships between researchers from both low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs) and high‐income countries (HICs). Inequitable engagement of LMIC collaborators can limit the impact of the research.
This article describes evidence of inequities in the conduct of global surgery research and outlines reasons why the inequities in this research field may be more acute than in other global health research disciplines. The paper goes on to describe activities for building a collaborative research portfolio in rural Rwanda.
Inequities in global surgery research collaborations can be attributed to: a limited number and experience of researchers working in this field; time constraints on both HIC and LMIC global surgery researchers; and surgical journal policies. Approaches to build a robust, collaborative research portfolio in Rwanda include leading research trainings focused on global surgery projects, embedding surgical fellows in Rwanda to provide bidirectional research training and outlining all research products, ensuring that all who are engaged have opportunities to grow in capacities, including leading research, and that collaborators share opportunities equitably. Of the 22 published or planned papers, half are led by Rwandan researchers, and the research now has independent research funding.
It is unacceptable to gather data from an LMIC without meaningful engagement in all aspects of the research and sharing opportunities with local collaborators. The strategies outlined here can help research teams build global surgery research portfolios that optimize the potential for equitable engagement.Full text
You may also be interested in
Authors: T. J. Patterson, J. Beck, P. J. Currie, R. A. J. Spence, G. Spence
Authors: L. de Munter, S. Polinder, C. L. P. van de Ree, N. Kruithof, K. W. W. Lansink, E. W. Steyerberg et al.
Nationwide observational study of mortality from complicated intra‐abdominal infections and the role of bacterial cultures.
Authors: A. Tsuchiya, H. Yasunaga, Y. Tsutsumi, T. Kawahara, H. Matsui, K. Fushimi et al.
Surgical removal of the index node marked using magnetic seed localization to assess response to neoadjuvant immunotherapy in patients with stage III melanoma.
Authors: B. Schermers, V. Franke, E. A. Rozeman, B. A. van de Wiel, A. Bruining, M. W. Wouters et al.
Impact of enhanced recovery on oncological outcomes following minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer.
Authors: B. J. Quiram, J. Crippa, F. Grass, J. K. Lovely, K. T. Behm, D. T. Colibaseanu et al.
Prospective cohort study of ultrasound surveillance of regional lymph nodes in patients with intermediate‐risk cutaneous melanoma.
Authors: A. J. Hayes, E. Moskovic, K. O'Meara, H. G. Smith, R. J. E. Pope, J. Larkin et al.
Multicentre study of non‐surgical management of diverticulitis with abscess formation. BJS 2019; 106: 458-466.
Authors: D. P. V. Lambrichts, H. E. Bolkenstein, D. C. H. E. van der Does, D. Dieleman, R. M. P. H. Crolla, J. W. T. Dekker et al.
Authors: S. Biondo
Randomized clinical trial
Randomized clinical trial of selective decontamination of the digestive tract in elective colorectal cancer surgery (SELECT trial). BJS 2019; 106: 355-363.
Authors: G. S. A. Abis, H. B. A. C. Stockmann, H. J. Bonjer, N. van Veenendaal, M. L. M. van Doorn‐Schepens, A. E. Budding et al.
Authors: R. Miller, J. C. R. Wormald, R. G. Wade, D. P. Collins
Time to calcitonin normalization after surgery for node‐negative and node‐positive medullary thyroid cancer. BJS 2019; 106: 412-418.
Authors: A. Machens, K. Lorenz, H. Dralle
Notes: Sensitive as prognostic tool