Influence of national centralization of oesophagogastric cancer on management and clinical outcome from emergency upper gastrointestinal conditions. BJS 2018; 105: 113-120.
Published: 20th November 2017
Authors: S. R. Markar, H. Mackenzie, T. Wiggins, A. Askari, A. Karthikesalingam, O. Faiz et al.
In England in 2001 oesophagogastric cancer surgery was centralized. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether centralization of oesophagogastric cancer to high‐volume centres has had an effect on mortality from different emergency upper gastrointestinal conditions.
The Hospital Episode Statistics database was used to identify patients admitted to hospitals in England (1997–2012). The influence of oesophagogastric high‐volume cancer centre status (20 or more resections per year) on 30‐ and 90‐day mortality from oesophageal perforation, paraoesophageal hernia and perforated peptic ulcer was analysed.
Over the study interval, 3707, 12 441 and 56 822 patients with oesophageal perforation, paraoesophageal hernia and perforated peptic ulcer respectively were included. There was a passive centralization to high‐volume cancer centres for oesophageal perforation (26·9 per cent increase), paraoesophageal hernia (19·5 per cent increase) and perforated peptic ulcer (23·0 per cent increase). Management of oesophageal perforation in high‐volume centres was associated with a reduction in 30‐day (HR 0·58, 95 per cent c.i. 0·45 to 0·74) and 90‐day (HR 0·62, 0·49 to 0·77) mortality. High‐volume cancer centre status did not affect mortality from paraoesophageal hernia or perforated peptic ulcer. Annual emergency admission volume thresholds at which mortality improved were observed for oesophageal perforation (5 patients) and paraoesophageal hernia (11). Following centralization, the proportion of patients managed in high‐volume cancer centres that reached this volume threshold was 88·0 per cent for oesophageal perforation, but only 30·3 per cent for paraoesophageal hernia.
Centralization of low incidence conditions such as oesophageal perforation to high‐volume cancer centres provides a greater level of expertise and ultimately reduces mortality.Read more
You may also be interested in
Comparison of gaze behaviour of trainee and experienced surgeons during laparoscopic gastric bypass.
Authors: S. Erridge, H. Ashraf, S. Purkayastha, A. Darzi, M. H. Sodergren
Notes: Potential uses in training and assessment
Impact of weight loss and eating difficulties on health‐related quality of life up to 10 years after oesophagectomy for cancer.
Authors: P. Anandavadivelan, A. Wikman, A. Johar, P. Lagergren
Notes: Associated with deterioration of HRQOL
Meta‐analysis of microsatellite instability in relation to clinicopathological characteristics and overall survival in gastric cancer.
Authors: K. Polom, L. Marano, D. Marrelli, R. De Luca, G. Roviello, V. Savelli et al.
Notes: Microsatellite instability subgroup does better
Authors: V. Wanjura, E. Szabo, J. Österberg, J. Ottosson, L. Enochsson, G. Sandblom et al.
Notes: Avoid unnecessary surgery
Authors: J. Deng, J. Guo, G. Ma, H. Zhang, D. Sun, Y. Hou et al.
Notes: Identifies a poor prognosis group
Meta‐analysis of the impact of surgical approach on the grade of mesorectal excision in rectal cancer. BJS 2017; 104: 1609-1619.
Authors: B. Creavin, M. E. Kelly, E. Ryan, D. C. Winter
Notes: Open excision provides better‐quality mesorectum
Multicentre cohort study to define and validate pathological assessment of response to neoadjuvant therapy in oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma. BJS 2017; 104: 1816-1828.
Authors: F. Noble, M. A. Lloyd, R. Turkington, E. Griffiths, M. O'Donovan, J. R. O'Neill et al.
Notes: Response associated with survival
Authors: P. Probst, S. Ohmann, U. Klaiber, F. J. Hüttner, A. T. Billeter, A. Ulrich et al.
Notes: Publication bias likely
Randomized clinical trial
Double‐blind randomized clinical trial of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy versus radiologically inserted gastrostomy in children. BJS 2017; 104: 1620-1627.
Authors: R. R. Singh, S. A. Nah, D. J. Roebuck, S. Eaton, A. Pierro, J. I. Curry et al.
Notes: No difference in the number or magnitude of complications
Weekend admission and mortality for gastrointestinal disorders across England and Wales. BJS 2017; 104: 1723-1734.
Authors: S. E. Roberts, T. H. Brown, K. Thorne, R. A. Lyons, A. Akbari, D. J. Napier et al.
Notes: Worst for gastrointestinal cancer and liver disease
Use of endoscopy to determine the resection margin during laparoscopic gastrectomy for cancer. BJS 2017; 104: 1829-1836.
Authors: S. Kawakatsu, M. Ohashi, N. Hiki, S. Nunobe, M. Nagino, T. Sano et al.
Effect of age on rates of palliative surgery and chemotherapy use in patients with locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer. BJS 2017; 104: 1837-1846.
Authors: S. D. Nelen, M. van Putten, V. E. P. P. Lemmens, K. Bosscha, J. H. W. de Wilt, R. H. A. Verhoeven et al.
Notes: Less surgery, more chemotherapy , but no change in survival