Meta‐analysis of prophylactic abdominal drainage in pancreatic surgery. BJS 2017; 104: 660-668.
Published: 20th March 2017
Authors: F. J. Hüttner, P. Probst, P. Knebel, O. Strobel, T. Hackert, A. Ulrich et al.
Intra‐abdominal drains are frequently used after pancreatic surgery whereas their benefit in other gastrointestinal operations has been questioned. The objective of this meta‐analysis was to compare abdominal drainage with no drainage after pancreatic surgery.
Some 711 patients from three
Pancreatic resection with, or without abdominal drainage results in similar rates of mortality, morbidity and reintervention.Read more
You may also be interested in
Dual hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion in liver transplants donated after circulatory death grafts.
Authors: R. van Rijn, N. Karimian, A. P. M. Matton, L. C. Burlage, A. C. Westerkamp, A. P. van den Berg et al.
Notes: Increases donor pool
Prospective trial to evaluate the prognostic value of different nutritional assessment scores in pancreatic surgery (NURIMAS Pancreas).
Authors: P. Probst, S. Haller, T. Bruckner, A. Ulrich, O. Strobel, T. Hackert et al.
Notes: No scores of use
Authors: K. Sasaki, G. A. Margonis, N. Andreatos, A. Wilson, M. Weiss, C. Wolfgang et al.
Notes: Anti‐angiogenesis antibody of benefit
Impact of hepatobiliary service centralization on treatment and outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer and liver metastases.
Authors: A. E. Vallance, J. vanderMeulen, A. Kuryba, I. D. Botterill, J. Hill, D. G. Jayne et al.
Notes: Better survival
Local tumour progression after percutaneous ablation of colorectal liver metastases according to RAS mutation status. BJS 2017; 104: 760-768.
Authors: B. C. Odisio, S. Yamashita, S. Y. Huang, S. Harmoush, S. E. Kopetz, K. Ahrar et al.
Notes: Mutant RAS poor prognostic factor
Immunohistochemical hENT1 expression as a prognostic biomarker in patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma undergoing adjuvant gemcitabine‐based chemotherapy. BJS 2017; 104: 328-336.
Authors: N. T. E. Bird, M. Elmasry, R. Jones, E. Psarelli, J. Dodd, H. Malik et al.
Notes: Standardization needed to see if it's really useful
Authors: I. Tarantino, R. Warschkow, T. Hackert, B. M. Schmied, M. W. Büchler, O. Strobel et al.
Notes: Higher number, lower survival
Effect of obeticholic acid on liver regeneration following portal vein embolization in an experimental model. BJS 2017; 104: 590-599.
Authors: P. B. Olthof, F. Huisman, F. G. Schaap, K. P. van Lienden, R. J. Bennink, R. F. van Golen et al.
Notes: May enhance liver regeneration
Outcome after laparoscopic and open resections of posterosuperior segments of the liver. BJS 2017; 104: 751-759.
Authors: V. Scuderi, L. Barkhatov, R. Montalti, F. Ratti, F. Cipriani, F. Pardo et al.
Notes: Laparoscopic equals open
Population‐based study on resection rates and survival in patients with colorectal liver metastasis in Norway. BJS 2017; 104: 580-589.
Authors: J.‐H. Angelsen, A. Horn, H. Sorbye, G. E. Eide, I. M. Løes, A. Viste et al.
Notes: Variation among patients and regions
Relationship between tumour size and outcome in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. BJS 2017; 104: 600-607.
Authors: D. Ansari, M. Bauden, S. Bergström, R. Rylance, G. Marko‐Varga, R. Andersson et al.
Notes: Size matters
Randomized clinical trial
Randomized clinical trial of open versus laparoscopic left lateral hepatic sectionectomy within an enhanced recovery after surgery programme (ORANGE II study). BJS 2017; 104: 525-535.
Authors: E. M. Wong‐Lun‐Hing, R. M. van Dam, G. J. P. van Breukelen, P. J. Tanis, F. Ratti, R. van Hillegersberg et al.
Notes: A lesson in trial design