Meta‐analysis of the effect of bariatric surgery on physical function.
Published: 12th June 2018
Authors: M. T. Adil, V. Jain, F. Rashid, O. Al‐taan, D. Whitelaw, P. Jambulingam et al.
Obesity leads to an impairment of physical function that limits the ability to perform basic physical activities affecting quality of life. Literature on the effect of bariatric surgery on physical function is confounding and generally of low quality.
A comprehensive search was undertaken using MEDLINE, Scopus (including Embase), CENTRAL, PubMed, SPORTDiscus, Scirus and OpenGrey for published research and non‐published studies to 31 March 2017. Studies employing objective measurement and self‐reporting of physical function before and after bariatric surgery were included. The magnitude of experimental effect was calculated in terms of the standardized mean difference (MD), and confidence intervals were set at 95 per cent to reflect a significance level of 0·05.
Thirty studies including 1779 patients met the inclusion criteria. Physical function improved after bariatric surgery at 0–6 months (MD 0·90, 95 per cent c.i. 0·60 to 1·21;
Bariatric surgery improves physical function significantly within 6 months of the procedure and this effect persists over time to 36 months after surgery, whether measured objectively or by self‐reporting.Full text
You may also be interested in
Authors: B.‐H. Min, M. Hong, J. H. Lee, P.‐L. Rhee, T. S. Sohn, S. Kim et al.
Predictive value of abdominal CT in evaluating internal herniation after bariatric laparoscopic Roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass.
Authors: J. C. Ederveen, M. M. G. van Berckel, S. W. Nienhuijs, R. J. P. Weber, J. Nederend
Notes: Important tool for correct diagnosis
Nomogram to predict lymph node metastasis in patients with early oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Authors: H. Zheng, H. Tang, H. Wang, Y. Fang, Y. Shen, M. Feng et al.
Notes: Selecting patients for surgery or endoscopic treatment
Authors: M. Kanda, D. Shimizu, H. Tanaka, C. Tanaka, D. Kobayashi, M. Hayashi et al.
Notes: Potential target for therapy
Development and validation of a difficulty score to predict intraoperative complications during laparoscopic liver resection.
Authors: M. C. Halls, G. Berardi, F. Cipriani, L. Barkhatov, P. Lainas, S. Harris et al.
Notes: Helps improve selection for laparoscopic liver resection
Authors: D. Zeng, R. Zhou, Y. Yu, Y. Luo, J. Zhang, H. Sun et al.
Notes: Immunoscore predicts prognosis in gastric cancer
Reappraisal of classification of distal cholangiocarcinoma based on tumour depth. BJS 2018; 105: 867-875.
Authors: H. Aoyama, T. Ebata, M. Hattori, M. Takano, H. Yamamoto, M. Inoue et al.
Notes: Better for T staging
Authors: S. D. Nelen, K. Bosscha, V. E. P. P. Lemmens, H. H. Hartgrink, R. H. A. Verhoeven, J. H. W. de Wilt et al.
Notes: Age does not matter
Prediction of major complications after hepatectomy using liver stiffness values determined by magnetic resonance elastography.
Authors: N. Sato, A. Kenjo, T. Kimura, R. Okada, T. Ishigame, Y. Kofunato et al.
Notes: liver stiffness predicts complications
Nationwide trends in the incidence and outcome of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumour in the imatinib era. BJS 2018; 105: 1020-1027.
Authors: W. T. A. van der Graaf, R. Tielen, J. J. Bonenkamp, V. Lemmens, R. H. A. Verhoeven, J. H. W. de Wilt et al.
Notes: Surgery improves survival
Association between hospital volume and quality of gastric cancer surgery in the CRITICS trial. BJS 2018; 105: 728-735.
Authors: Y. H. M. Claassen, J. W. van Sandick, H. H. Hartgrink, J. L. Dikken, W. O. De Steur, N. C. T. van Grieken et al.
Notes: High volume better quality