Meta‐analysis of the impact of surgical approach on the grade of mesorectal excision in rectal cancer. BJS 2017; 104: 1609-1619.
Published: 17th October 2017
Authors: B. Creavin, M. E. Kelly, E. Ryan, D. C. Winter
The subspecialization of colorectal surgeons, and improvements in the quality of mesorectal excision have revolutionized rectal cancer surgery. With the increasing use of minimally invasive techniques, the completeness of the mesorectal excision has been questioned. This study aimed to assess the pathological outcomes of open
A meta‐analysis of RCTs was undertaken. The primary endpoint was the adequacy of the mesorectal excision. Secondary endpoints included circumferential resection margin and distance to resection margins.
Four studies were included, reporting on 2319 patients; 972 (41·9 per cent) had open and 1347 (58·1 per cent) had laparoscopic resections. Meta‐analysis of adequacy of the mesorectal excision showed a small difference in achieving an intact mesorectum in favour of open surgery (risk ratio (RR) 1·06, 95 per cent c.i. 1·02 to 1·10;
Small differences in mesorectal quality were evident between open and laparoscopic rectal resections. This may be attributable to use of laparoscopic instruments; however, to date minor defects have not affected oncological outcomes.Read more
You may also be interested in
Meta‐analysis of microsatellite instability in relation to clinicopathological characteristics and overall survival in gastric cancer.
Authors: K. Polom, L. Marano, D. Marrelli, R. De Luca, G. Roviello, V. Savelli et al.
Notes: Microsatellite instability subgroup does better
Authors: V. Wanjura, E. Szabo, J. Österberg, J. Ottosson, L. Enochsson, G. Sandblom et al.
Notes: Avoid unnecessary surgery
Authors: J. Deng, J. Guo, G. Ma, H. Zhang, D. Sun, Y. Hou et al.
Notes: Identifies a poor prognosis group
Multicentre cohort study to define and validate pathological assessment of response to neoadjuvant therapy in oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma. BJS 2017; 104: 1816-1828.
Authors: F. Noble, M. A. Lloyd, R. Turkington, E. Griffiths, M. O'Donovan, J. R. O'Neill et al.
Notes: Response associated with survival
Authors: P. Probst, S. Ohmann, U. Klaiber, F. J. Hüttner, A. T. Billeter, A. Ulrich et al.
Notes: Publication bias likely
Randomized clinical trial
Double‐blind randomized clinical trial of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy versus radiologically inserted gastrostomy in children. BJS 2017; 104: 1620-1627.
Authors: R. R. Singh, S. A. Nah, D. J. Roebuck, S. Eaton, A. Pierro, J. I. Curry et al.
Notes: No difference in the number or magnitude of complications
Weekend admission and mortality for gastrointestinal disorders across England and Wales. BJS 2017; 104: 1723-1734.
Authors: S. E. Roberts, T. H. Brown, K. Thorne, R. A. Lyons, A. Akbari, D. J. Napier et al.
Notes: Worst for gastrointestinal cancer and liver disease
Use of endoscopy to determine the resection margin during laparoscopic gastrectomy for cancer. BJS 2017; 104: 1829-1836.
Authors: S. Kawakatsu, M. Ohashi, N. Hiki, S. Nunobe, M. Nagino, T. Sano et al.
Effect of age on rates of palliative surgery and chemotherapy use in patients with locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer. BJS 2017; 104: 1837-1846.
Authors: S. D. Nelen, M. van Putten, V. E. P. P. Lemmens, K. Bosscha, J. H. W. de Wilt, R. H. A. Verhoeven et al.
Notes: Less surgery, more chemotherapy , but no change in survival
Changes in treatment and outcome of oesophageal cancer in Denmark between 2004 and 2013. BJS 2017; 104: 1338-1345.
Authors: D. W. Kjaer, H. Larsson, L. B. Svendsen, L. S. Jensen
Notes: Better short‐term outcome
Randomized clinical trial
Randomized clinical trial of psychological support and sleep adjuvant measures for postoperative sleep disturbance in patients undergoing oesophagectomy. BJS 2017; 104: 1307-1314.
Authors: M. Scarpa, E. Pinto, E. Saraceni, F. Cavallin, M. Parotto, R. Alfieri et al.
Notes: Psychologists improve postoperative sleep
Adaptation of the By‐Band randomized clinical trial to By‐Band‐Sleeve to include a new intervention and maintain relevance of the study to practice. BJS 2017; 104: 1207-1214.
Authors: C. A. Rogers, B. C. Reeves, J. Byrne, J. L. Donovan, G. Mazza, S. Paramasivan et al.
Notes: Something to consider