Meta‐analysis of the influence of lifestyle changes for preoperative weight loss on surgical outcomes.
Published: 17th October 2018
Authors: M. Roman, A. Monaghan, G. F. Serraino, D. Miller, S. Pathak, F. Lai et al.
The aim was to investigate whether preoperative weight loss results in improved clinical outcomes in surgical patients with clinically significant obesity.
This was a systematic review and aggregate data meta‐analysis of RCTs and cohort studies. PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL Plus databases were searched from inception to February 2018. Eligibility criteria were: studies assessing the effect of weight loss interventions (low‐energy diets with or without an exercise component) on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing any surgical procedure. Data on 30‐day or all‐cause in‐hospital mortality were extracted and synthesized in meta‐analyses. Postoperative thromboembolic complications, duration of surgery, infection and duration of hospital stay were also assessed.
A total of 6060 patients in four RCTs and 12 cohort studies, all from European and North American centres, were identified. Most were in the field of bariatric surgery and all had some methodological limitations. The pooled effect estimate suggested that preoperative weight loss programmes were effective, leading to significant weight reduction compared with controls: mean difference –7·42 (95 per cent c.i. –10·09 to –4·74) kg (P < 0·001). Preoperative weight loss interventions were not associated with a reduction in perioperative mortality (odds ratio 1·41, 95 per cent c.i. 0·24 to 8·40; I2 = 0 per cent, P = 0·66) but the event rate was low. The weight loss groups had shorter hospital stay (by 27 per cent). No differences were found for morbidity.
This limited preoperative weight loss has advantages but may not alter the postoperative morbidity or mortality risk.Full text
You may also be interested in
Evaluating the collection, comparability and findings of six global surgery indicators. BJS 2019; 106: e138-e150.
Authors: H. Holmer, A. Bekele, L. Hagander, E. M. Harrison, P. Kamali, J. S. Ng‐Kamstra et al.
Cost‐effectiveness analysis of a multicentre randomized clinical trial comparing surgery with conservative management for recurrent and ongoing diverticulitis (DIRECT trial).
Authors: H. E. Bolkenstein, G. A. de Wit, E. C. J. Consten, B. J. M. Van de Wall, I. A. M. J. Broeders, W. A. Draaisma et al.
Notes: Maintained benefits
Validation of the Bluebelle Wound Healing Questionnaire for assessment of surgical‐site infection in closed primary wounds after hospital discharge.
Authors: Rhiannon Macefield, Jane Blazeby, Barnaby Reeves, Sara Brookes, Kerry Avery, Chris Rogers et al.
Notes: Simple and valid
Authors: K. Søreide, D. C. Winter
Relationship between R1 resection, tumour rupture and recurrence in resected gastrointestinal stromal tumour.
Authors: T. Hølmebakk, B. Bjerkehagen, I. Hompland, S. Stoldt, K. Boye
Notes: Tumour rupture is most important
Authors: R. D. Staiger, H. Schwandt, M. A. Puhan, P.‐A. Clavien
Authors: S. Wiig, C. Macrae
Authors: F. Dossa, N. N. Baxter
Survival after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and oesophagectomy versus definitive chemoradiotherapy for patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Authors: B.‐Y. Wang, S.‐C. Wu, H.‐C. Chen, W.‐H. Hung, C.‐H. Lin, C.‐L. Huang et al.
Notes: Surgery after chemoradiation indicated
Effect of preoperative biliary drainage on cholestasis‐associated inflammatory and fibrotic gene signatures in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. BJS 2019; 106: 55-58.
Authors: M. J. Reiniers, L. de Haan, R. Weijer, J. K. Wiggers, A. Jongejan, P. D. Moerland et al.
Impact of postoperative complications on outcomes after oesophagectomy for cancer. BJS 2019; 106: 111-119.
Authors: L. Goense, J. Meziani, J. P. Ruurda, R. van Hillegersberg
Authors: S. M. L. de Mik, F. E. Stubenrouch, R. Balm, D. T. Ubbink
Notes: Heterogeneous data