MRI‐based score to predict surgical difficulty in patients with rectal cancer.
Published: 31st October 2017
Authors: L. Escal, S. Nougaret, B. Guiu, M. M. Bertrand, H. de Forges, R. Tetreau et al.
Rectal cancer surgery is technically challenging and depends on many factors. This study evaluated the ability of clinical and anatomical factors to predict surgical difficulty in total mesorectal excision.
Consecutive patients who underwent total mesorectal excision for locally advanced rectal cancer in a laparoscopic, robotic or open procedure after neoadjuvant treatment, between 2005 and 2014, were included in this retrospective study. Preoperative clinical and MRI data were studied to develop a surgical difficulty grade.
In total, 164 patients with a median age of 61 (range 26–86) years were considered to be at low risk (143, 87·2 per cent) or high risk (21, 12·8 per cent) of surgical difficulty. In multivariable analysis, BMI at least 30 kg/m2 (
This simple morphometric score may assist surgical decision‐making and comparative study by defining operative difficulty before surgery.Read more
You may also be interested in
Meta‐analysis of outcomes following resection of the primary tumour in patients presenting with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Authors: U. Nitsche, C. Stöß, L. Stecher, D. Wilhelm, H. Friess, G. O. Ceyhan et al.
Notes: Selected patients only
Population‐based study of factors predicting treatment intention in patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer. BJS 2017; 104: 1866-1873.
Authors: K. Westberg, G. Palmer, F. Hjern, C. Nordenvall, H. Johansson, T. Holm et al.
Notes: Defines good selection criteria
Outcome after restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch–anal anastomosis in children and adults. BJS 2017; 104: 1640-1647.
Authors: K. Diederen, S. S. Sahami, M. M. Tabbers, M. A. Benninga, A. Kindermann, P. J. Tanis et al.
Notes: Comparable in children and adults
Weekend admission and mortality for gastrointestinal disorders across England and Wales. BJS 2017; 104: 1723-1734.
Authors: S. E. Roberts, T. H. Brown, K. Thorne, R. A. Lyons, A. Akbari, D. J. Napier et al.
Notes: Worst for gastrointestinal cancer and liver disease
Randomized clinical trial
Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic ultrasonography before laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection. BJS 2017; 104: 1462-1469.
Authors: S. B. Ellebæk, C. W. Fristrup, C. Hovendal, N. Qvist, L. Bundgaard, S. Salomon et al.
Notes: No additional benefit
Authors: K. Sahnan, A. Askari, S. O. Adegbola, P. J. Tozer, R. K. S. Phillips, A. Hart et al.
Notes: Women more likely to develop fistula
Short‐ and medium‐term outcomes following primary ileocaecal resection for Crohn’s disease in two specialist centres. BJS 2017; 104: 1713-1722.
Authors: A. de Buck van Overstraeten, E. J. Eshuis, S. Vermeire, G. Van Assche, M. Ferrante, G. R. D'Haens et al.
Notes: Clear margins and smoking cessation are key
Randomized clinical trial
Randomized clinical trial of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus sham electrical stimulation in patients with faecal incontinence. BJS 2017; 104: 1167-1176.
Authors: A. A. van der Wilt, G. Giuliani, C. Kubis, B. P. W. van Wunnik, I. Ferreira, S. O. Breukink et al.
Notes: Limited case for PTNS
Clinical assessment to determine the risk of bowel cancer using Symptoms, Age, Mass and Iron deficiency anaemia (SAMI). BJS 2017; 104: 1393-1404.
Authors: M. R. Thompson, D. P. O'Leary, K. Flashman, A. Asiimwe, B. G. Ellis, A. Senapati et al.
Notes: Can define high risk
One‐year results of the SCANDIV randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic lavage versus primary resection for acute perforated diverticulitis. BJS 2017; 104: 1382-1392.
Authors: J. K. Schultz, C. Wallon, L. Blecic, H. M. Forsmo, J. Folkesson, P. Buchwald et al.
Notes: Fewer stomas with lavage
Meta‐analysis of hybrid natural‐orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery versus laparoscopic surgery. BJS 2017; 104: 977-989.
Authors: D. C. Steinemann, P. C. Müller, P. Probst, A.‐C. Schwarz, M. W. Büchler, B. P. Müller‐Stich et al.
Notes: Less pain was the only gain