Multicentre observational study of the Gatekeeper™ for faecal incontinence. BJS 2016; 103: 290-299.
Published: 1st December 2015
Authors: C. Ratto, S. Buntzen, F. Aigner, D. F. Altomare, A. Heydari, L. Donisi et al.
A variety of therapeutic approaches are available for faecal incontinence. Implantation of Gatekeeper™ prostheses is a new promising option. The primary endpoint of this prospective observational multicentre study was to assess the clinical efficacy of Gatekeeper™ implantation in patients with faecal incontinence. Secondary endpoints included the assessment of patients' quality of life, and the feasibility and safety of implantation.
Patients with faecal incontinence, with either intact sphincters or internal anal sphincter lesions extending for less than 60° of the anal circumference, were selected. Intersphincteric implantation of six prostheses was performed. At baseline, and 1, 3 and 12 months after implantation, the number of faecal incontinence episodes, Cleveland Clinic Faecal Incontinence, Vaizey and American Medical Systems, Faecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale and Short Form 36 Health Survey scores were recorded. Endoanal ultrasonography was performed at baseline and follow‐up.
Fifty‐four patients were implanted. After Gatekeeper™ implantation, incontinence to gas, liquid and solid stool improved significantly, soiling was reduced, and ability to defer defaecation enhanced. All faecal incontinence severity scores were significantly reduced, and patients' quality of life improved. At 12 months, 30 patients (56 per cent) showed at least 75 per cent improvement in all faecal incontinence parameters, and seven (13 per cent) became fully continent. In three patients a single prosthesis was extruded during surgery, but was replaced immediately. After implantation, prosthesis dislodgement occurred in three patients; no replacement was required.
Anal implantation of the Gatekeeper™ in patients with faecal incontinence was effective and safe. Clinical benefits were sustained at 1‐year follow‐up.Full text
You may also be interested in
Authors: R. L. Venchiarutti, M. J. Solomon, C. E. Koh, J. M. Young, D. Steffens
Meta‐analysis of the role of colonoscopy after an episode of left‐sided acute diverticulitis. BJS 2019; 106: 988-997.
Authors: S. J. Rottier, S. T. Dijk, A. A. W. Geloven, W. H. Schreurs, W. A. Draaisma, W. A. Enst et al.
Randomized clinical trial
Multicentre randomized clinical trial of colonic J pouch or straight stapled colorectal reconstruction after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
Authors: S. Pucciarelli, P. Del Bianco, U. Pace, F. Bianco, A. Restivo, I. Maretto et al.
Authors: T. O. Sillo, A. D. Beggs, D. G. Morton, G. Middleton
Meta‐analysis of the effect of extending the interval after long‐course chemoradiotherapy before surgery in locally advanced rectal cancer.
Authors: É. J. Ryan, D. P. O'Sullivan, M. E. Kelly, A. Z. Syed, P. C. Neary, P. R. O'Connell et al.
Randomized clinical trial
Randomized clinical trial of accelerated enhanced recovery after minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery (RecoverMI trial).
Authors: B. K. Bednarski, T. P. Nickerson, Y. N. You, C. A. Messick, B. Speer, V. Gottumukkala et al.
Postoperative complications in relation to overall treatment time in patients with rectal cancer receiving neoadjuvant radiotherapy.
Authors: J. Erlandsson, D. Pettersson, B. Glimelius, T. Holm, A. Martling
Organoids from colorectal peritoneal metastases as a platform for improving hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.
Authors: I. Ubink, A. C. F. Bolhaqueiro, S. G. Elias, D. A. E. Raats, A. Constantinides, N. A. Peters et al.
Immunogenomic profiles associated with response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer.
Authors: T. Akiyoshi, N. Tanaka, K. Kiyotani, O. Gotoh, N. Yamamoto, K. Oba et al.
BRAF mutation is not associated with an increased risk of recurrence in patients undergoing resection of colorectal liver metastases.
Authors: J.‐B. Bachet, N. Moreno‐Lopez, L. Vigano, U. Marchese, M. Gelli, L. Raoux et al.
Propensity score‐matched analysis of oncological outcome between stent as bridge to surgery and emergency resection in patients with malignant left‐sided colonic obstruction. BJS 2019; 106: 1075-1086.
Authors: F. J. Amelung, W. A. A. Borstlap, E. C. J. Consten, J. V. Veld, E. E. van Halsema, W. A. Bemelman et al.
Systematic review of outcomes after total neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer. BJS 2019; 106: 979-987.
Authors: A. Zaborowski, A. Stakelum, D. C. Winter