One‐year results of the SCANDIV randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic lavage versus primary resection for acute perforated diverticulitis.
Published: 20th June 2017
Authors: J. K. Schultz, C. Wallon, L. Blecic, H. M. Forsmo, J. Folkesson, P. Buchwald et al.
Recent randomized trials demonstrated that laparoscopic lavage compared with resection for Hinchey
Between February 2010 and June 2014, patients from 21 hospitals in Norway and Sweden presenting with suspected perforated diverticulitis were enrolled in a multicentre
Of 199 enrolled patients, 101 were assigned randomly to laparoscopic lavage and 98 to colonic resection. Perforated diverticulitis was confirmed at the time of surgery in 89 and 83 patients respectively. Within 1 year after surgery, neither severe complications (34
The advantages of laparoscopic lavage should be weighed against the risk of secondary intervention (if sepsis is unresolved). Assessment to exclude malignancy (although uncommon) is advised. Registration number:
You may also be interested in
Clinical assessment to determine the risk of bowel cancer using Symptoms, Age, Mass and Iron deficiency anaemia (SAMI).
Authors: M. R. Thompson, D. P. O'Leary, K. Flashman, A. Asiimwe, B. G. Ellis, A. Senapati et al.
Notes: Clinical assessment can define high risk
Meta‐analysis of hybrid natural‐orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery versus laparoscopic surgery. BJS 2017; 104: 977-989.
Authors: D. C. Steinemann, P. C. Müller, P. Probst, A.‐C. Schwarz, M. W. Büchler, B. P. Müller‐Stich et al.
Notes: Less pain was the only gain
Cost‐effectiveness of high‐sensitivity faecal immunochemical test and colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer.
Authors: M. Aronsson, P. Carlsson, L.‐Å. Levin, J. Hager, R. Hultcrantz
Notes: Once only or repeat colonoscopy most effective?
Population‐based study to re‐evaluate optimal lymph node yield in colonic cancer. BJS 2017; 104: 1087-1096.
Authors: J. C. Del Paggio, Y. Peng, X. Wei, S. Nanji, P. H. MacDonald, C. Krishnan Nair et al.
Notes: Twelve is not the magic number
Randomized clinical trial
Randomized clinical trial comparing collagen plug and advancement flap for trans‐sphincteric anal fistula.
Authors: J. Bondi, J. Avdagic, U. Karlbom, O. Hallböök, D. Kalman, J. Šaltytė Benth et al.
Notes: Plug inferior to flap
Randomized clinical trial
Randomized clinical trial of biodegradeable intraluminal sheath to prevent anastomotic leak after stapled colorectal anastomosis. BJS 2017; 104: 1010-1019.
Authors: I. S. Bakker, A. N. Morks, H. O. ten Cate Hoedemaker, J. G. M. Burgerhof, H. G. Leuvenink, J. B. van Praagh et al.
Notes: Not effective
Systematic review of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced peritoneal carcinomatosis. BJS 2017; 104: 669-678.
Authors: F. Grass, A. Vuagniaux, H. Teixeira‐Farinha, K. Lehmann, N. Demartines, M. Hübner et al.
Notes: Shows promise
Authors: J. Toh, P. H. Chapuis, L. Bokey, C. Chan, K. J. Spring, O. F. Dent et al.
Population‐based study demonstrating an increase in colorectal cancer in young patients. BJS 2017; 104: 1063-1068.
Authors: J. Gandhi, C. Davidson, C. Hall, J. Pearson, T. Eglinton, C. Wakeman et al.
Notes: Worrying trends in the under 50s
Authors: A. Dohan, C. Hoeffel, P. Soyer, A. S. Jannot, P.‐J. Valette, A. Thivolet et al.
Notes: Combination useful
Authors: C. J. Verberne, Z. Zhan, E. R. van den Heuvel, F. Oppers, A. M. de Jong, I. Grossmann et al.
Notes: Intensive follow‐up no effect on survival
Systematic review of the role of biomarkers in diagnosing anastomotic leakage following colorectal surgery. BJS 2017; 104: 503-512.
Authors: B. U. Su'a, H. L. Mikaere, J. L. Rahiri, I. B. Bissett, A. G. Hill
Notes: Limited value over clinical judgement