Pooled analysis of WHO Surgical Safety Checklist use and mortality after emergency laparotomy. BJS 2019; 106: e103-e112.
Published: 8th January 2019
Authors: Hannah S Thomas, Thomas G Weiser, Thomas M Drake, Stephen R Knight, Cameron Fairfield, Adesoji O Ademuyiwa et al.
The World Health Organization (WHO) Surgical Safety Checklist has fostered safe practice for 10 years, yet its place in emergency surgery has not been assessed on a global scale. The aim of this study was to evaluate reported checklist use in emergency settings and examine the relationship with perioperative mortality in patients who had emergency laparotomy.
In two multinational cohort studies, adults undergoing emergency laparotomy were compared with those having elective gastrointestinal surgery. Relationships between reported checklist use and mortality were determined using multivariable logistic regression and bootstrapped simulation.
Of 12 296 patients included from 76 countries, 4843 underwent emergency laparotomy. After adjusting for patient and disease factors, checklist use before emergency laparotomy was more common in countries with a high Human Development Index (HDI) (2455 of 2741, 89·6 per cent) compared with that in countries with a middle (753 of 1242, 60·6 per cent; odds ratio (OR) 0·17, 95 per cent c.i. 0·14 to 0·21, P < 0·001) or low (363 of 860, 42·2 per cent; OR 0·08, 0·07 to 0·10, P < 0·001) HDI. Checklist use was less common in elective surgery than for emergency laparotomy in high‐HDI countries (risk difference −9·4 (95 per cent c.i. −11·9 to −6·9) per cent; P < 0·001), but the relationship was reversed in low‐HDI countries (+12·1 (+7·0 to +17·3) per cent; P < 0·001). In multivariable models, checklist use was associated with a lower 30‐day perioperative mortality (OR 0·60, 0·50 to 0·73; P < 0·001). The greatest absolute benefit was seen for emergency surgery in low‐ and middle‐HDI countries.
Checklist use in emergency laparotomy was associated with a significantly lower perioperative mortality rate. Checklist use in low‐HDI countries was half that in high‐HDI countries.Full text
You may also be interested in
Authors: T. J. Patterson, J. Beck, P. J. Currie, R. A. J. Spence, G. Spence
Authors: L. de Munter, S. Polinder, C. L. P. van de Ree, N. Kruithof, K. W. W. Lansink, E. W. Steyerberg et al.
Surgical removal of the index node marked using magnetic seed localization to assess response to neoadjuvant immunotherapy in patients with stage III melanoma.
Authors: B. Schermers, V. Franke, E. A. Rozeman, B. A. van de Wiel, A. Bruining, M. W. Wouters et al.
Nationwide observational study of mortality from complicated intra‐abdominal infections and the role of bacterial cultures.
Authors: A. Tsuchiya, H. Yasunaga, Y. Tsutsumi, T. Kawahara, H. Matsui, K. Fushimi et al.
Impact of enhanced recovery on oncological outcomes following minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer.
Authors: B. J. Quiram, J. Crippa, F. Grass, J. K. Lovely, K. T. Behm, D. T. Colibaseanu et al.
Prospective cohort study of ultrasound surveillance of regional lymph nodes in patients with intermediate‐risk cutaneous melanoma.
Authors: A. J. Hayes, E. Moskovic, K. O'Meara, H. G. Smith, R. J. E. Pope, J. Larkin et al.
Multicentre study of non‐surgical management of diverticulitis with abscess formation. BJS 2019; 106: 458-466.
Authors: D. P. V. Lambrichts, H. E. Bolkenstein, D. C. H. E. van der Does, D. Dieleman, R. M. P. H. Crolla, J. W. T. Dekker et al.
Authors: S. Biondo
Randomized clinical trial
Randomized clinical trial of selective decontamination of the digestive tract in elective colorectal cancer surgery (SELECT trial). BJS 2019; 106: 355-363.
Authors: G. S. A. Abis, H. B. A. C. Stockmann, H. J. Bonjer, N. van Veenendaal, M. L. M. van Doorn‐Schepens, A. E. Budding et al.
Authors: R. Miller, J. C. R. Wormald, R. G. Wade, D. P. Collins
Time to calcitonin normalization after surgery for node‐negative and node‐positive medullary thyroid cancer. BJS 2019; 106: 412-418.
Authors: A. Machens, K. Lorenz, H. Dralle
Notes: Sensitive as prognostic tool