Prognostic impact of perihepatic lymph node metastases in patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases. BJS 2018; 105: 1200-1209.
Published: 17th April 2018
Authors: M. Okuno, C. Goumard, T. Mizuno, S. Kopetz, K. Omichi, C.‐W. D. Tzeng et al.
Although perihepatic lymph node metastases (PLNMs) are known to be a poor prognosticator for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs), optimal management remains unclear. This study aimed to determine the risk factors for PLNMs, and the survival impact of their number and location in patients with resectable CRLMs.
Data on patients with CRLM who underwent hepatectomy during 2003–2014 were analysed retrospectively. Recurrence‐free (RFS) and overall (OS) survival were calculated according to presence, number and location of PLNMs. Risk factors for PLNM were evaluated by logistic regression analysis.
Of 1485 patients, 174 underwent lymphadenectomy, and 54 (31·0 per cent) had PLNM. Ten patients (5·7 per cent) who had lymphadenectomy and 176 (13·4 per cent) who did not underwent repeat hepatectomy. Survival of patients with PLNM was significantly poorer than that of patients without (RFS: 5·3
Patients undergoing repeat hepatectomy and those with primary tumour lymph node metastases are at significant risk of PLNM. Although PLNM is a poor prognostic factor independent of perihepatic lymph node station, patients with one or two PLNMs have a more favourable outcome than those with more PLNMs.Full text
You may also be interested in
Cost‐effectiveness analysis of a multicentre randomized clinical trial comparing surgery with conservative management for recurrent and ongoing diverticulitis (DIRECT trial).
Authors: H. E. Bolkenstein, G. A. de Wit, E. C. J. Consten, B. J. M. Van de Wall, I. A. M. J. Broeders, W. A. Draaisma et al.
Notes: Maintained benefits
Randomized clinical trial
Randomized trial of two types of gastrojejunostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy and risk of delayed gastric emptying (PAUDA trial). BJS 2019; 106: 46-54.
Authors: J. Busquets, S. Martín, J. Fabregat, L. Secanella, N. Pelaez, E. Ramos et al.
Notes: No difference in outcomes
Authors: L. Koskenvuo, N. Malila, J. Pitkäniemi, J. Miettinen, S. Heikkinen, V. Sallinen et al.
Notes: Only of benefit in men.
Effect of preoperative biliary drainage on cholestasis‐associated inflammatory and fibrotic gene signatures in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. BJS 2019; 106: 55-58.
Authors: M. J. Reiniers, L. de Haan, R. Weijer, J. K. Wiggers, A. Jongejan, P. D. Moerland et al.
Authors: I. van 't Sant, W. J. van Eden, M. P. Engbersen, N. F. M. Kok, K. Woensdregt, D. M. J. Lambregts et al.
Notes: Promising staging tool
Authors: C. T. Aquina, A. Z. Becerra, Z. Xu, C. F. Justiniano, K. Noyes, J. R. T. Monson et al.
Notes: Non‐operative management better
Cost‐effectiveness of liver transplantation in patients with colorectal metastases confined to the liver. BJS 2019; 106: 132-141.
Authors: G. M. W. Bjørnelv, S. Dueland, P.‐D. Line, P. Joranger, Å. A. Fretland, B. Edwin et al.
Notes: Not cost effective for everyone
Systematic review of treatment intensification using novel agents for chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer. BJS 2018; 105: 1553-1572.
Authors: R. Clifford, N. Govindarajah, J. L. Parsons, S. Gollins, N. P. West, D. Vimalachandran et al.
Notes: Promising agents coming
Authors: R. Ahl, P. Matthiessen, X. Fang, Y. Cao, G. Sjolin, R. Lindgren et al.
Notes: Reduces mortality
Mitochondrial function after associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy in an experimental model. BJS 2019; 106: 120-131.
Authors: A. Budai, G. Horváth, L. Tretter, Z. Radák, E. Koltai, Z. Bori et al.
Notes: Defines the biochemical basis
Authors: M. Del Chiaro, K. Søreide
Bowel dysfunction after sigmoid resection for cancer and its impact on quality of life. BJS 2019; 106: 142-151.
Authors: H. Elfeki, H. M. Larsen, K. J. Emmertsen, P. Christensen, M. Youssef, W. Khafagy et al.
Notes: Substantial impairment common