Proposal for a new classification for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma based on tumour depth. BJS 2019; 106: 427-435.
Published: 24th January 2019
Authors: K. Shinohara, T. Ebata, Y. Shimoyama, M. Nakaguro, T. Mizuno, K. Matsuo et al.
The T system for distal cholangiocarcinoma has been revised from a layer‐based to a depth‐based approach in the current American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) classification. In perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, tumour depth in the staging scheme has not yet been addressed. The aim of this study was to propose a new T system using measured tumour depth in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.
Patients who underwent hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma between 2001 and 2014 were reviewed retrospectively. The vertical distance between the top of the tumour and deepest invasive cells was measured as invasive tumour thickness (ITT) by two independent pathologists. Log rank statistics were used to determine cut‐off points, and the concordance (C) index was used to assess survival discrimination of each T system.
ITT was measurable in all 440 patients, with a median value of 6·0 (range 0–45) mm. The median difference in ITT between observers was 0·6 (range 0–20) mm. Cut‐off points for prognosis were 1, 5 and 8 mm. Five‐year survival decreased with increasing ITT (P < 0·001): 67 per cent for ITT less than 1 mm (25 patients), 54·9 per cent for ITT 1 mm and over to less than 5 mm (138 patients), 43·4 per cent for ITT 5 mm and over to less than 8 mm (118 patients), and 32·2 per cent for ITT 8 mm and over (159 patients). The C‐index of this classification was comparable to that of the current AJCC T classification (0·598 versus 0·589).
ITT is a reliable approach for making a depth assessment in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. A four‐tier ITT classification with cut‐off points of 1, 5 and 8 mm is an adequate alternative to the current layer‐based T classification.Full text
You may also be interested in
Authors: A. Pulvirenti, A. Pea, N. Rezaee, C. Gasparini, G. Malleo, M. J. Weiss et al.
Impact of postoperative infective complications on long‐term survival after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.
Authors: T. Yang, K. Liu, C.‐F. Liu, Q. Zhong, J. Zhang, J.‐J. Yu et al.
Meta‐analysis of randomized clinical trials of early versus delayed cholecystectomy for mild gallstone pancreatitis.
Authors: N. Moody, A. Adiamah, F. Yanni, D. Gomez
Authors: L. Lundgren, C. Muszynska, A. Ros, G. Persson, O. Gimm, B. Andersson et al.
Meta‐analysis of effect of routine enteral nutrition on postoperative outcomes after pancreatoduodenectomy.
Authors: M. Tanaka, M. Heckler, A. L. Mihaljevic, P. Probst, U. Klaiber, U. Heger et al.
Management of isolated recurrence after surgery for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. BJS 2019; 106: 898-909.
Authors: Y. I. Kim, K. B. Song, Y.‐J. Lee, K.‐M. Park, D. W. Hwang, J. H. Lee et al.
Costs and quality of life in a randomized trial comparing minimally invasive and open distal pancreatectomy (LEOPARD trial). BJS 2019; 106: 910-921.
Authors: J. van Hilst, E. A. Strating, T. de Rooij, F. Daams, S. Festen, B. Groot Koerkamp et al.
Hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma after perioperative management of portal hypertension. BJS 2019; 106: 1066-1074.
Authors: N. Takemura, T. Aoki, K. Hasegawa, J. Kaneko, J. Arita, N. Akamatsu et al.
Clinical value of additional resection of a margin‐positive distal bile duct in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. BJS 2019; 106: 774-782.
Authors: S. Otsuka, T. Ebata, Y. Yokoyama, T. Mizuno, T. Tsukahara, Y. Shimoyama et al.
Impact of resection margin status on recurrence and survival in pancreatic cancer surgery. BJS 2019; 106: 1055-1065.
Authors: W. S. Tummers, J. V. Groen, B. G. Sibinga Mulder, A. Farina‐Sarasqueta, J. Morreau, H. Putter et al.
Multicentre study of multidisciplinary team assessment of pancreatic cancer resectability and treatment allocation. BJS 2019; 106: 756-764.
Authors: J. Kirkegård, E. K. Aahlin, M. Al‐Saiddi, S. O. Bratlie, M. Coolsen, R. J. de Haas et al.
Outcomes following pancreatic surgery using three different thromboprophylaxis regimens. BJS 2019; 106: 765-773.
Authors: R. G. Hanna‐Sawires, J. V. Groen, F. A. Klok, R. A. E. M. Tollenaar, W. E. Mesker, R. J. Swijnenburg et al.