Prospective trial to evaluate the prognostic value of different nutritional assessment scores in pancreatic surgery (NURIMAS Pancreas). BJS 2017; 104: 1053-1062.
Published: 30th March 2017
Authors: P. Probst, S. Haller, T. Bruckner, A. Ulrich, O. Strobel, T. Hackert et al.
Preoperative nutritional status has an impact on patients' clinical outcome. For pancreatic surgery, however, it is unclear which nutritional assessment scores adequately assess malnutrition associated with postoperative outcome.
Patients scheduled for elective pancreatic surgery at the University of Heidelberg were screened for eligibility. Twelve nutritional assessment scores were calculated before operation, and patients were categorized as either at risk or not at risk for malnutrition by each score. The postoperative course was monitored prospectively by assessors blinded to the nutritional status. The primary endpoint was major complications evaluated for each score in a multivariable analysis corrected for known risk factors in pancreatic surgery.
Overall, 279 patients were analysed. A major complication occurred in 61 patients (21·9 per cent). The proportion of malnourished patients differed greatly among the scores, from 1·1 per cent (Nutritional Risk Index) to 79·6 per cent (Nutritional Risk Classification). In the multivariable analysis, only raised amylase level in drainage fluid on postoperative day 1 (odds ratio (
None of the nutritional assessment scores defined malnutrition relevant to complications after pancreatic surgery and these scores may thus be abandoned.Read more
You may also be interested in
Authors: R. Green, S. C. Charman, T. Palser
Notes: Variation in compliance related to outcomes
Authors: T. Maeta, T. Ebata, E. Hayashi, T. Kawahara, S. Mizuno, N. Matsumoto et al.
Notes: Poor survival despite portal vein resection
Average treatment effect of hepatic resection versus locoregional therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma.
Authors: A. Cucchetti, V. Mazzaferro, A. D. Pinna, C. Sposito, R. Golfieri, C. Serra et al.
Notes: Resection is better
Meta‐analysis of determinants of survival following treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma.
Authors: S. Erridge, P. H. Pucher, S. R. Markar, G. Malietzis, T. Athanasiou, A. Darzi et al.
Notes: No evidence for best treatment
Meta‐analysis of single‐port versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy comparing body image and cosmesis. BJS 2017; 104: 1141-1159.
Authors: R. Haueter, T. Schütz, D. A. Raptis, P.‐A. Clavien, M. Zuber
Notes: Single port superior for cosmesis, body image and pain
Systematic review of the influence of chemotherapy‐associated liver injury on outcome after partial hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases.
Authors: J. Zhao, K. M. C. van Mierlo, J. Gómez‐Ramírez, H. Kim, C. H. C. Pilgrim, P. Pessaux et al.
Notes: Increased complications in severe SD and steatohepatitis
Authors: R. Ahola, A. Siiki, K. Vasama, M. Vornanen, J. Sand, J. Laukkarinen et al.
Notes: Centralization influences long‐term survival
Systematic review of transarterial embolization for hepatocellular adenomas. BJS 2017; 104: 823-835.
Authors: B. V. van Rosmalen, R. J. S. Coelen, M. Bieze, O. M. van Delden, J. Verheij, C. H. C. Dejong et al.
Notes: Safe alternative to surgery
Meta‐analysis of adjuvant therapy following curative surgery for periampullary adenocarcinoma. BJS 2017; 104: 814-822.
Authors: A. Acharya, S. R. Markar, M. H. Sodergren, G. Malietzis, A. Darzi, T. Athanasiou et al.
Notes: No benefit
Authors: T. Ebata, T. Mizuno, Y. Yokoyama, T. Igami, G. Sugawara, M. Nagino et al.
Notes: irresectability revisited
Survival benefit of liver resection for Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B hepatocellular carcinoma. BJS 2017; 104: 1045-1052.
Authors: H. Kim, S. W. Ahn, S. K. Hong, K. C. Yoon, H.‐S. Kim, Y. R. Choi et al.
Notes: Selected patients benefit