Quality of life in a randomized trial of early closure of temporary ileostomy after rectal resection for cancer (EASY trial). BJS 2018; 105: 244-251.
Published: 23rd November 2017
Authors: J. Park, A. K. Danielsen, E. Angenete, D. Bock, A. C. Marinez, E. Haglind et al.
A temporary ileostomy may reduce symptoms from anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer resection. Earlier results of the EASY trial showed that early closure of the temporary ileostomy was associated with significantly fewer postoperative complications. The aim of the present study was to compare health‐related quality of life (HRQOL) following early
Early closure of a temporary ileostomy (at 8–13 days) was compared with late closure (at more than 12 weeks) in a multicentre RCT (EASY) that included patients who underwent rectal resection for cancer. Inclusion of participants was made after index surgery. Exclusion criteria were signs of anastomotic leakage, diabetes mellitus, steroid treatment, and signs of postoperative complications at clinical evaluation 1–4 days after rectal resection. HRQOL was evaluated at 3, 6 and 12 months after resection using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaires QLQ‐C30 and QLQ‐CR29 and Short Form 36 (SF‐36®).
There were 112 patients available for analysis. Response rates of the questionnaires were 82–95 per cent, except for EORTC QLQ‐C30 at 12 months, to which only 54–55 per cent of the patients responded owing to an error in questionnaire distribution. There were no clinically significant differences in any questionnaire scores between the groups at 3, 6 or 12 months.
Although the randomized study found that early closure of the temporary ileostomy was associated with significantly fewer complications, this clinical advantage had no effect on the patients' HRQOL. Registration number: NCT01287637 (
You may also be interested in
Authors: C. T. Aquina, A. Z. Becerra, Z. Xu, C. F. Justiniano, K. Noyes, J. R. T. Monson et al.
Notes: Non‐operative management better
Cost‐effectiveness of liver transplantation in patients with colorectal metastases confined to the liver.
Authors: G. M. W. Bjørnelv, S. Dueland, P.‐D. Line, P. Joranger, Å. A. Fretland, B. Edwin et al.
Notes: Not for every country
Systematic review of treatment intensification using novel agents for chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer. BJS 2018; 105: 1553-1572.
Authors: R. Clifford, N. Govindarajah, J. L. Parsons, S. Gollins, N. P. West, D. Vimalachandran et al.
Notes: Promising agents coming
Authors: R. Ahl, P. Matthiessen, X. Fang, Y. Cao, G. Sjolin, R. Lindgren et al.
Notes: Reduces mortality
Authors: H. Elfeki, H. M. Larsen, K. J. Emmertsen, P. Christensen, M. Youssef, W. Khafagy et al.
Notes: Sigmoid resection associated with bowel dysfunction
Authors: J. Segelman, C. Buchli, A. Svanström Röjvall, P. Matthiessen, S. Arver, M. Bottai et al.
Notes: Ovarian androgens reduced
Randomized clinical trial
Randomized clinical trial of short or long interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery for rectal cancer. BJS 2018; 105: 1417-1425.
Authors: E. Akgun, C. Caliskan, O. Bozbiyik, T. Yoldas, M. Sezak, S. Ozkok et al.
Notes: Worth waiting
Authors: M. Baré, L. Mora, N. Torà, M. J. Gil, I. Barrio, P. Collera et al.
Notes: Defines risk
Preoperative oral care and effect on postoperative complications after major cancer surgery. BJS 2018; 105: 1688-1696.
Authors: M. Ishimaru, H. Matsui, S. Ono, Y. Hagiwara, K. Morita, H. Yasunaga et al.
Notes: Preoperative dental care reduces postoperative pneumonia
Prognostic implications of MRI‐detected lateral nodal disease and extramural vascular invasion in rectal cancer.
Authors: D. P. Schaap, A. Ogura, J. Nederend, M. Maas, J. S. Cnossen, G. J. Creemers et al.
Notes: Defines recurrence risk
Multicentre international trial of laparoscopic lavage for Hinchey III acute diverticulitis (LLO Study).
Authors: G. A. Binda, M. A. Bonino, G. Siri, S. Di Saverio, G. Rossi, R. Nascimbeni et al.
Notes: Successful in the majority