Randomized clinical trial of antibiotic therapy for uncomplicated appendicitis. BJS 2017; 104: 1785-1790.
Published: 19th September 2017
Authors: H. C. Park, M. J. Kim, B. H. Lee
Uncomplicated appendicitis may resolve spontaneously or require treatment with antibiotics or appendicectomy. The aim of this randomized trial was to compare the outcome of a non‐antibiotic management strategy with that of antibiotic therapy in uncomplicated appendicitis.
Patients presenting to a university teaching hospital with CT‐verified uncomplicated simple appendicitis (appendiceal diameter no larger than 11 mm and without any signs of perforation) were randomized to management with a no‐antibiotic regimen with supportive care (intravenous fluids, analgesia and antipyretics as necessary) or a 4‐day course of antibiotics with supportive care. The primary endpoint was rate of total treatment failure, defined as initial treatment failure within 1 month and recurrence of appendicitis during the follow‐up period.
Some 245 patients were randomized within the trial, and followed up for a median of 19 months. The duration of hospital stay was shorter (mean 3·1
Treatment failure rates in patients presenting with CT‐confirmed uncomplicated appendicitis appeared similar among those receiving supportive care with either a no‐antibiotic regimen or a 4‐day course of antibiotics. Registration number: KCT0000124 (
You may also be interested in
Meta‐analysis of in‐hospital delay before surgery as a risk factor for complications in patients with acute appendicitis. BJS 2018; 105: 933-945.
Authors: S. T. van Dijk, A. H. van Dijk, M. G. Dijkgraaf, M. A. Boermeester
Notes: Delay is safe
Authors: T. G. Weiser, A. B. Haynes
Meta‐analysis comparing upfront surgery with neoadjuvant treatment in patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. BJS 2018; 105: 946-958.
Authors: E. Versteijne, J. A. Vogel, M. G. Besselink, O. R. C. Busch, J. W. Wilmink, J. G. Daams et al.
Notes: Improved survival with neoadjuvant treatment
Authors: F. P. Prete, T. Abdel‐Aziz, C. Morkane, C. Brain, T. R. Kurzawinski, P. Hindmarsh et al.
Notes: Centralization needed
Authors: M. Mansourati, V. Kumar, M. Khajanchi, M. L. Saha, S. Dharap, R. Seger et al.
Notes: High burden of late mortality
Meta‐analysis evaluating music interventions for anxiety and pain in surgery. BJS 2018; 105: 773-783.
Authors: A. Y. R. Kühlmann, A. de Rooij, L. F. Kroese, M. van Dijk, M. G. M. Hunink, J. Jeekel et al.
Prognostic significance of gross extrathyroidal extension invading only strap muscles in differentiated thyroid carcinoma. BJS 2018; 105: 1155-1162.
Authors: S. Y. Park, H. I. Kim, J.‐H. Kim, J. S. Kim, Y. L. Oh, S. W. Kim et al.
Notes: None, for survival
Authors: M. Almquist, K. Ivarsson, E. Nordenström, A. Bergenfelz
Notes: Higher than expected
Interobserver variability in the classification of appendicitis during laparoscopy. BJS 2018; 105: 1014-1019.
Authors: A. L. van den Boom, E. M. L. de Wijkerslooth, K. A. L. Mauff, I. Dawson, C. C. van Rossem, B. R. Toorenvliet et al.
Development and evaluation of a patient‐centred measurement tool for surgeons’ non‐technical skills. BJS 2018; 105: 876-884.
Authors: J. Yule, K. Hill, S. Yule
Notes: Valid and reliable