Randomized trial of two types of gastrojejunostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy and risk of delayed gastric emptying (PAUDA trial). BJS 2019; 106: 46-54.
Published: 3rd December 2018
Authors: J. Busquets, S. Martín, J. Fabregat, L. Secanella, N. Pelaez, E. Ramos et al.
Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) is the most important cause of an extended hospital stay after pancreatoduodenectomy. Reports suggest that a Roux‐en‐Y gastroenteric anastomosis may have lower incidence of DGE than a Billroth II reconstruction. The primary aim of this RCT was to compare Billroth II (single loop) and Roux‐en‐Y (double loop) after pancreatoduodenectomy to determine whether Roux‐en‐Y reconstruction is associated with a lower incidence of DGE. Secondary endpoints were postoperative complications.
This was a randomized unblinded single‐centre trial without masked evaluation of the main outcome. Patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy between 2013 and 2015 were randomized to undergo one of two types of gastroenteric anastomosis for reconstruction.
A total of 80 patients were randomized, 40 in each group. The incidence of DGE was the same in patients undergoing Billroth II or Roux‐en‐Y gastroenteric anastomosis (both 18 of 40 patients; P = 1·000). The grade of DGE was also similar in the Billroth II and Roux‐en‐Y groups (grade A, both 10 of 40; grade B, 5 of 40 versus 6 of 40; grade C, 3 of 40 versus 2 of 40; P = 0·962). The mortality rate was 3 per cent, with no significant difference between the two groups. There were no differences in the overall rate of postoperative morbidity, relaparotomy rate or duration of hospital stay.
The incidence and severity of DGE does not differ between single‐ or double‐loop gastroenteric anastomosis performed after pancreatoduodenectomy. Registration number: NCT00915863 (
You may also be interested in
Authors: T. Mizuno, T. Ebata, Y. Yokoyama, T. Igami, J. Yamaguchi, S. Onoe et al.
Systematic review of clinical prediction models for survival after surgery for resectable pancreatic cancer.
Authors: M. Strijker, J. W. Chen, T. H. Mungroop, N. B. Jamieson, C. H. van Eijck, E. W. Steyerberg et al.
Randomized clinical trial
Randomized trial of oral versus enteral feeding for patients with postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. BJS 2019; 106: 190-198.
Authors: J.‐M. Wu, T.‐C. Kuo, H.‐A. Chen, C.‐H. Wu, S.‐R. Lai, C.‐Y. Yang et al.
Clinical and experimental studies of intraperitoneal lipolysis and the development of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after pancreatic surgery.
Authors: Y. Uchida, T. Masui, K. Nakano, A. Yogo, A. Sato, K. Nagai et al.
Multicentre propensity score‐matched study of laparoscopic versus open repeat liver resection for colorectal liver metastases.
Authors: M. J. van der Poel, L. Barkhatov, D. Fuks, G. Berardi, F. Cipriani, A. Aljaiuossi et al.
Authors: T. M. Mackay, U. F. Wellner, L. B. van Rijssen, T. F. Stoop, O. R. Busch, B. Groot Koerkamp et al.
Authors: K. Shinohara, T. Ebata, Y. Shimoyama, M. Nakaguro, T. Mizuno, K. Matsuo et al.
Systematic review of management of incidental gallbladder cancer after cholecystectomy. BJS 2019; 106: 32-45.
Authors: K. Søreide, R. V. Guest, E. M. Harrison, T. J. Kendall, O. J. Garden, S. J. Wigmore et al.
Systematic review of the quantity and quality of randomized clinical trials in pancreatic surgery. BJS 2019; 106: 23-31.
Authors: F. J. Hüttner, L. Capdeville, F. Pianka, A. Ulrich, T. Hackert, M. W. Büchler et al.
Effect of preoperative biliary drainage on cholestasis‐associated inflammatory and fibrotic gene signatures in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. BJS 2019; 106: 55-58.
Authors: M. J. Reiniers, L. de Haan, R. Weijer, J. K. Wiggers, A. Jongejan, P. D. Moerland et al.
Cost‐effectiveness of liver transplantation in patients with colorectal metastases confined to the liver. BJS 2019; 106: 132-141.
Authors: G. M. W. Bjørnelv, S. Dueland, P.‐D. Line, P. Joranger, Å. A. Fretland, B. Edwin et al.
Notes: Not cost effective for everyone
Mitochondrial function after associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy in an experimental model. BJS 2019; 106: 120-131.
Authors: A. Budai, G. Horváth, L. Tretter, Z. Radák, E. Koltai, Z. Bori et al.
Notes: Defines the biochemical basis