Systematic review and simulation study of ignoring clustered data in surgical trials. BJS 2018; 105: 182-191.
Published: 5th February 2018
Authors: S. Dell‐Kuster, R. A. Droeser, J. Schäfer, V. Gloy, H. Ewald, S. Schandelmaier et al.
Multiple surgical procedures in a single patient are relatively common and lead to dependent (clustered) data. This dependency needs to be accounted for in study design and data analysis. A systematic review was performed to assess how clustered data were handled in inguinal hernia trials. The impact of ignoring clustered data was estimated using simulations.
PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library were reviewed systematically for RCTs published between 2004 and 2013, including patients undergoing unilateral or bilateral inguinal hernia repair. Study characteristics determining the appropriateness of handling clustered data were extracted. Using simulations, various statistical methods accounting for clustered data were compared with an analysis ignoring clustering by assuming 100 hernias, with a varying percentage of patients having bilateral hernias.
Of the 50 eligible trials including patients with bilateral hernias, 20 (40 per cent) did not provide information on how they dealt with clustered data and 18 (36 per cent) avoided clustering by assessing the outcome by patient and not by hernia. None of the remaining 12 trials (24 per cent) considered clustering in the design or analysis. In the simulations, ignoring clustering led to an increased type I error rate of up to 12 per cent and to a loss in power of up to 15 per cent, depending on whether the patient or the hernia was the randomization unit.
Clustering was rarely considered in inguinal hernia trials. The simulations underline the importance of considering clustering as part of the statistical analysis to avoid false‐positive and false‐negative results, and hence inappropriate study conclusions.Read more
You may also be interested in
Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for pseudomyxoma peritonei of appendicular and extra‐appendicular origin.
Authors: J.‐B. Delhorme, F. Severac, G. Averous, O. Glehen, G. Passot, N. Bakrin et al.
Notes: Survival similar
Randomized clinical trial
Randomized clinical trial of intraoperative parathyroid gland angiography with indocyanine green fluorescence predicting parathyroid function after thyroid surgery.
Authors: J. Vidal Fortuny, S. M. Sadowski, V. Belfontali, S. Guigard, A. Poncet, F. Ris et al.
Notes: Simplifies post‐op monitoring
Surgeon volume and prognosis of patients with advanced papillary thyroid cancer and lateral nodal metastasis. BJS 2018; 105: 270-278.
Authors: H. I. Kim, T. H. Kim, J.‐H. Choe, J.‐H. Kim, J. S. Kim, Y. N. Kim et al.
Notes: Volume is key
Effect of parathyroidectomy on quality of life and non‐specific symptoms in normocalcaemic primary hyperparathyroidism. BJS 2018; 105: 223-229.
Authors: S. Bannani, N. Christou, C. Guérin, A. Hamy, F. Sebag, M. Mathonnet et al.
Notes: Little improvement
Authors: J. Church
Authors: A. M. Altman, J. Y. C. Hui, T. M. Tuttle
Notes: Can be significant
Authors: H. M. Rossitti, P. Söderkvist, O. Gimm
Notes: Genotype dictates type of surgery
Long‐term outcome of prophylactic thyroidectomy in children carrying RET germline mutations. BJS 2018; 105: e150-e157.
Authors: A. Machens, M. Elwerr, K. Lorenz, F. Weber, H. Dralle
Notes: Early surgery better
Authors: P. M. Ferguson, G. V. Long, R. A. Scolyer, J. F. Thompson
Notes: Great advances
Authors: S. Hill
Authors: M. A. Stammes, S. L. Bugby, T. Porta, K. Pierzchalski, T. Devling, C. Otto et al.
Notes: Visible results