Systematic review of carotid artery procedures and the volume–outcome relationship in Europe. BJS 2017; 104: 1273-1283.
Published: 20th June 2017
Authors: P. Phillips, E. Poku, M. Essat, H. B. Woods, E. A. Goka, E. C. Kaltenthaler et al.
Hospitals that conduct more procedures on the carotid arteries may achieve better outcomes. In the context of ongoing reconfiguration of UK vascular services, this systematic review was conducted to evaluate the relationship between the volume of carotid procedures and outcomes, including mortality and stroke.
Searches of electronic databases identified studies that reported the effect of hospital or clinician volume on outcomes. Reference and citation searches were also performed. Inclusion was restricted to European populations on the basis that the model of healthcare delivery is similar across Europe, but differs from that in the USA and elsewhere. Analyses of hospital and clinician volume, and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) were conducted separately.
Eleven eligible studies were identified (233 411 participants), five from the UK, two from Sweden, one each from Germany, Finland and Italy, and a combined German, Austrian and Swiss population. All studies were observational. Two large studies (179 736 patients) suggested an inverse relationship between hospital volume and mortality (number needed to treat (NNT) as low as 165), and combined mortality and stroke (NNT as low as 93), following CEA. The evidence was less clear for CAS; multiple analyses in three studies did not identify convincing evidence of an association. Limited data are available on the relationship between clinician volume and outcome in CAS; in CEA, an inverse relationship was identified by two of three small studies.
The evidence from the largest and highest‐quality studies included in this review support the centralization of CEA.Read more
You may also be interested in
Authors: M. Kanapathy, R. Simpson, L. Madden, C. Thrasivoulou, A. Mosahebi, D. L. Becker et al.
Notes: Potential marker of disease severity
Cardiovascular and all‐cause mortality in patients with intermittent claudication and critical limb ischaemia.
Authors: S. T. W. van Haelst, C. Koopman, H. M. den Ruijter, F. L. Moll, F. L. Visseren, I. Vaartjes et al.
Notes: Declining mortality. Large burden cardiovascular deaths
Meta‐analysis of the association between peripheral artery disease and growth of abdominal aortic aneurysms. BJS 2017; 104: 1765-1774.
Authors: E. O. Matthews, S. E. Rowbotham, J. V. Moxon, R. E. Jones, M. Vega de Ceniga, J. Golledge et al.
Notes: No significant association
Randomized feasibility trial of high‐intensity interval training before elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. BJS 2017; 104: 1791-1801.
Authors: G. A. Tew, A. M. Batterham, K. Colling, J. Gray, K. Kerr, E. Kothmann et al.
Notes: Precursor to a bigger trial
Meta‐analysis of the association between alcohol consumption and abdominal aortic aneurysm. BJS 2017; 104: 1756-1764.
Authors: S. M. Spencer, A. J. Trower, X. Jia, D. J. A. Scott, D. C. Greenwood
Notes: Small increase above 2 units/day
Meta‐analysis of the costs of carotid artery stenting and carotid endarterectomy. BJS 2017; 104: 1284-1292.
Authors: E. E. de Vries, V. G. M. Baldew, H. M. den Ruijter, G. J. de Borst
Systematic review of patient‐reported outcome measures in patients with varicose veins. BJS 2017; 104: 1424-1432.
Authors: A. Aber, E. Poku, P. Phillips, M. Essat, H. Buckley Woods, S. Palfreyman et al.
Notes: AVVQ and SF‐36 good options
Authors: T. R. A. Lane, L. Varatharajan, F. Fiorentino, A. C. Shepherd, L. Zimmo, M. S. Gohel et al.
Notes: Unreliable predictor of disease severity and PROMs
Sex differences in mortality after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the UK. BJS 2017; 104: 1656-1664.
Authors: D. A. Sidloff, A. Saratzis, M. J. Sweeting, J. Michaels, J. T. Powell, S. G. Thompson et al.
Notes: Mortality double in women
Time‐dependent trends in cardiovascular adverse events during follow‐up after carotid or iliofemoral endarterectomy. BJS 2017; 104: 1477-1485.
Authors: I. D. van Koeverden, S. T. W. van Haelst, S. Haitjema, J.‐P. P. M. de Vries, F. L. Moll, H. M. den Ruijter et al.
Notes: No decline in events
Association between metformin prescription and growth rates of abdominal aortic aneurysms. BJS 2017; 104: 1486-1493.
Authors: J. Golledge, J. Moxon, J. Pinchbeck, G. Anderson, S. Rowbotham, J. Jenkins et al.
Notes: Worth an RCT
Systematic review of mortality risk prediction models in the era of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery. BJS 2017; 104: 964-976.
Authors: N. Lijftogt, T. W. F. Luijnenburg, A. C. Vahl, E. D. Wilschut, V. J. Leijdekkers, M. F. Fiocco et al.
Notes: No more please