Systematic review of patient‐reported outcome measures in patients with varicose veins. BJS 2017; 104: 1424-1432.
Published: 3rd August 2017
Authors: A. Aber, E. Poku, P. Phillips, M. Essat, H. Buckley Woods, S. Palfreyman et al.
Varicose veins can affect quality of life. Patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs) provide a direct report from the patient about the impact of the disease without interpretation from clinicians or anyone else. The aim of this study was to examine the quality of the psychometric evidence for PROMs used in patients with varicose veins.
A systematic review was undertaken to identify studies that reported the psychometric properties of generic and disease‐specific PROMs in patients with varicose veins. Literature searches were conducted in databases including MEDLINE, up to July 2016. The psychometric criteria used to assess these studies were adapted from published recommendations in accordance with US Food and Drug Administration guidance.
Nine studies were included which reported on aspects of the development and/or validation of one generic (36‐Item Short Form Health Survey, SF‐36®) and three disease‐specific (Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire, AVVQ; Varicose Veins Symptoms Questionnaire, VVSymQ®; Specific Quality‐of‐life and Outcome Response – Venous, SQOR‐V) PROMs. The evidence from included studies provided data to support the construct validity, test–retest reliability and responsiveness of the AVVQ. However, its content validity, including weighting of the AVVQ questions, was biased and based on the opinion of clinicians, and the instrument had poor acceptability. VVSymQ® displayed good responsiveness and acceptability rates. SF‐36® was considered to have satisfactory responsiveness and internal consistency.
There is a scarcity of psychometric evidence for PROMs used in patients with varicose veins. These data suggest that AVVQ and SF‐36® are the most rigorously evaluated PROMs in patients with varicose veins.Read more
You may also be interested in
Meta‐analysis of the procedural risks of carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting over time.
Authors: K. Lokuge, D. D. de Waard, A. Halliday, A. Gray, R. Bulbulia, B. Mihaylova et al.
Notes: Endarterectomy outcomes improving
Authors: M. Kanapathy, R. Simpson, L. Madden, C. Thrasivoulou, A. Mosahebi, D. L. Becker et al.
Notes: Potential marker of disease severity
Cardiovascular and all‐cause mortality in patients with intermittent claudication and critical limb ischaemia.
Authors: S. T. W. van Haelst, C. Koopman, H. M. den Ruijter, F. L. Moll, F. L. Visseren, I. Vaartjes et al.
Notes: Declining mortality. Large burden cardiovascular deaths
Meta‐analysis of the association between peripheral artery disease and growth of abdominal aortic aneurysms. BJS 2017; 104: 1765-1774.
Authors: E. O. Matthews, S. E. Rowbotham, J. V. Moxon, R. E. Jones, M. Vega de Ceniga, J. Golledge et al.
Notes: No significant association
Randomized feasibility trial of high‐intensity interval training before elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. BJS 2017; 104: 1791-1801.
Authors: G. A. Tew, A. M. Batterham, K. Colling, J. Gray, K. Kerr, E. Kothmann et al.
Notes: Precursor to a bigger trial
Meta‐analysis of the association between alcohol consumption and abdominal aortic aneurysm. BJS 2017; 104: 1756-1764.
Authors: S. M. Spencer, A. J. Trower, X. Jia, D. J. A. Scott, D. C. Greenwood
Notes: Small increase above 2 units/day
Meta‐analysis of the costs of carotid artery stenting and carotid endarterectomy. BJS 2017; 104: 1284-1292.
Authors: E. E. de Vries, V. G. M. Baldew, H. M. den Ruijter, G. J. de Borst
Authors: T. R. A. Lane, L. Varatharajan, F. Fiorentino, A. C. Shepherd, L. Zimmo, M. S. Gohel et al.
Notes: Unreliable predictor of disease severity and PROMs
Sex differences in mortality after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the UK. BJS 2017; 104: 1656-1664.
Authors: D. A. Sidloff, A. Saratzis, M. J. Sweeting, J. Michaels, J. T. Powell, S. G. Thompson et al.
Notes: Mortality double in women
Time‐dependent trends in cardiovascular adverse events during follow‐up after carotid or iliofemoral endarterectomy. BJS 2017; 104: 1477-1485.
Authors: I. D. van Koeverden, S. T. W. van Haelst, S. Haitjema, J.‐P. P. M. de Vries, F. L. Moll, H. M. den Ruijter et al.
Notes: No decline in events
Association between metformin prescription and growth rates of abdominal aortic aneurysms. BJS 2017; 104: 1486-1493.
Authors: J. Golledge, J. Moxon, J. Pinchbeck, G. Anderson, S. Rowbotham, J. Jenkins et al.
Notes: Worth an RCT
Systematic review of carotid artery procedures and the volume–outcome relationship in Europe. BJS 2017; 104: 1273-1283.
Authors: P. Phillips, E. Poku, M. Essat, H. B. Woods, E. A. Goka, E. C. Kaltenthaler et al.
Notes: More justification for higher‐volume centres