Systematic review of the influence of socioeconomic deprivation on mortality after colorectal surgery. BJS 2018; 105: 959-970.
Published: 16th April 2018
Authors: T. E. Poulton, T. Salih, P. Martin, A. Rojas‐Garcia, R. Raine, S. R. Moonesinghe et al.
Socioeconomic deprivation is a potentially important factor influencing surgical outcomes. This systematic review aimed to summarize the evidence for any association between socioeconomic group and mortality after colorectal surgery, and to report the definitions of deprivation used and the approaches taken to adjust for co‐morbidity in this patient population.
MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched for studies up to November 2016 on adult patients undergoing major colorectal surgery, which reported on mortality according to socioeconomic group. Risk of bias and study quality were assessed by extracting data relating to study size, and variations in inclusion and exclusion criteria. Quality was assessed using a modification of a previously described assessment tool.
The literature search identified 59 studies published between 1993 and 2016, reporting on 2 698 403 patients from eight countries. Overall findings showed evidence for higher mortality in more deprived socioeconomic groups, both in the perioperative period and in the longer term. Studies differed in how they defined socioeconomic groups, but the most common approach was to use one of a selection of multifactorial indices based on small geographical areas. There was no consistent approach to adjusting for co‐morbidity but, where this was considered, the Charlson Co‐morbidity Index was most frequently used.
This systematic review suggests that socioeconomic deprivation influences mortality after colorectal surgery.Full text
You may also be interested in
Authors: M. R. Weiser, M. Gonen, S. Usiak, T. Pottinger, P. Samedy, D. Patel et al.
Notes: Protocol‐driven programme works
Meta‐analysis of in‐hospital delay before surgery as a risk factor for complications in patients with acute appendicitis. BJS 2018; 105: 933-945.
Authors: S. T. van Dijk, A. H. van Dijk, M. G. Dijkgraaf, M. A. Boermeester
Notes: Delay is safe
Magnetic resonance tumour regression grade and pathological correlates in patients with rectal cancer.
Authors: J. K. Jang, J. L. Lee, S. H. Park, H. J. Park, I. J. Park, J. H. Kim et al.
Long‐term prognostic impact of surgical complications in the German Rectal Cancer Trial CAO/ARO/AIO‐94.
Authors: T. Sprenger, T. Beißbarth, R. Sauer, J. Tschmelitsch, R. Fietkau, T. Liersch et al.
Notes: Morbidity matters
Oncological outcome after MRI‐based selection for neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in the OCUM Rectal Cancer Trial.
Authors: R. Ruppert, T. Junginger, H. Ptok, J. Strassburg, C. A. Maurer, P. Brosi et al.
Notes: Limiting radiotherapy appears safe.
Randomized clinical trial
Randomized clinical trial of elective resection versus observation in diverticulitis with extraluminal air or abscess initially managed conservatively. BJS 2018; 105: 971-979.
Authors: K. You, R. Bendl, C. Taut, R. Sullivan, M. Gachabayov, R. Bergamaschi et al.
Notes: Conservative management appropriate
Authors: E. Duchalais, T. Glyn Mullaney, G. M. Spears, S. R. Kelley, K. Mathis, W. S. Harmsen et al.
Notes: Post‐treatment T stage predicts prognosis
Nationwide trends in the incidence and outcome of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumour in the imatinib era. BJS 2018; 105: 1020-1027.
Authors: W. T. A. van der Graaf, R. Tielen, J. J. Bonenkamp, V. Lemmens, R. H. A. Verhoeven, J. H. W. de Wilt et al.
Notes: Surgery improves survival
Prognostic impact of perihepatic lymph node metastases in patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases. BJS 2018; 105: 1200-1209.
Authors: M. Okuno, C. Goumard, T. Mizuno, S. Kopetz, K. Omichi, C.‐W. D. Tzeng et al.
Notes: Bad sign of advanced disease
Novel de novo synthesized phosphate carrier compound ABA‐PEG20k‐Pi20 suppresses collagenase production in Enterococcus faecalis and prevents colonic anastomotic leak in an experimental model.
Authors: M. Wiegerinck, S. K. Hyoju, J. Mao, A. Zaborin, C. Adriaansens, E. Salzman et al.
Notes: Further evidence the microbiome may be important
Two‐year results of the randomized clinical trial DILALA comparing laparoscopic lavage with resection as treatment for perforated diverticulitis. BJS 2018; 105: 1128-1134.
Authors: A. Kohl, J. Rosenberg, D. Bock, T. Bisgaard, S. Skullman, A. Thornell et al.
Notes: Laparoscopic lavage still an option
Authors: F. Ris, E. Liot, N. C. Buchs, R. Kraus, G. Ismael, V. Belfontali et al.
Notes: Appears to reduce leaks