Systematic review of the prevalence, impact and mitigating strategies for bullying, undermining behaviour and harassment in the surgical workplace. BJS 2018; 105: 1390-1397.
Published: 14th July 2018
Authors: U. A. Halim, D. M. Riding
Bullying, undermining behaviour and harassment (BUBH) have been reported in entertainment, politics and sport. Such behaviours may also be common in surgery, and are frequently associated with poor patient care and inferior outcomes. The aim was to define the prevalence and impact of this behaviour in the international surgical workplace, and to explore counterstrategies.
A systematic review was conducted by searching EMBASE, Medline, PsycINFO and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews in August 2017. Original research studies (Oxford Centre for Evidence‐based Medicine levels 1–4) investigating the prevalence and impact of BUBH in surgery, and/or counterstrategies, were eligible for inclusion. The review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines.
Of 2692 papers, 32 were eligible for inclusion. Twenty‐two reported the prevalence of BUBH in surgery, 11 studied the impact of this behaviour and six investigated counterstrategies. Prevalence data showed that BUBH are common in the surgical workplace. Their impact can be profound, compromising mental health, reducing job satisfaction, and inducing suicidal ideation. Formal reporting systems were perceived as ineffective and even potentially harmful to victims.
Bullying, undermining behaviour and harassment are highly prevalent within surgery, and extremely damaging to victims. There is little high‐quality research into counterstrategies, although professionalism training using simulated scenarios may be useful.Full text
You may also be interested in
Authors: R. Miller, J. C. R. Wormald, R. G. Wade, D. P. Collins
Time to calcitonin normalization after surgery for node‐negative and node‐positive medullary thyroid cancer.
Authors: A. Machens, K. Lorenz, H. Dralle
Notes: Sensitive as prognostic tool
Contralateral surgery in patients scheduled for total thyroidectomy with initial loss or absence of signal during neural monitoring.
Authors: A. Sitges‐Serra, L. Gallego‐Otaegui, J. Fontané, L. Trillo, L. Lorente‐Poch, J. Sancho et al.
Authors: L. M. Almond, F. Tirotta, H. Tattersall, J. Hodson, T. Cascella, M. Barisella et al.
Notes: Weak for liposarcoma
Systematic review to assess the possibility of return of cerebral and cardiac activity after normothermic regional perfusion for donors after circulatory death. BJS 2019; 106: 174-180.
Authors: I. M. Shapey, A. Summers, T. Augustine, D. van Dellen
Authors: S. P. Stawicki, B. C. Nwomeh, G. L. Peck, Z. C. Sifri, M. Garg, J. V. Sakran et al.
Notes: Agreed framework with high standards needed
Authors: T. G. Weiser, J. A. Forrester, T. Negussie
Authors: L. Roa, D. T. Jumbam, E. Makasa, J. G. Meara
Notes: Must work to agreed national plans
Pooled analysis of WHO Surgical Safety Checklist use and mortality after emergency laparotomy. BJS 2019; 106: e103-e112.
Authors: Hannah S Thomas, Thomas G Weiser, Thomas M Drake, Stephen R Knight, Cameron Fairfield, Adesoji O Ademuyiwa et al.
Systematic review of the use of big data to improve surgery in low‐ and middle‐income countries. BJS 2019; 106: e62-e72.
Authors: S. R. Knight, R. Ots, M. Maimbo, T. M. Drake, C. J. Fairfield, E. M. Harrison et al.