Systematic review of the use of big data to improve surgery in low‐ and middle‐income countries. BJS 2019; 106: e62-e72.
Published: 8th January 2019
Authors: S. R. Knight, R. Ots, M. Maimbo, T. M. Drake, C. J. Fairfield, E. M. Harrison et al.
Technological advances have led to the generation of large amounts of data, both in surgical research and practice. Despite this, it is unclear how much originates in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs) and what barriers exist to the use of such data in improving surgical care. The aim of this review was to capture the extent and impact of programmes that use large volumes of patient data on surgical care in LMICs.
A PRISMA‐compliant systematic literature review of PubMed, Embase and Google Scholar was performed in August 2018. Prospective studies collecting large volumes of patient‐level data within LMIC settings were included and evaluated qualitatively.
A total of 68 studies were included from 71 LMICs, involving 708 032 patients. The number of patients in included studies varied widely (from 335 to 428 346), with 25 reporting data on 3000 or more LMIC patients. Patient inclusion in large‐data studies in LMICs has increased dramatically since 2015. Studies predominantly involved Brazil, China, India and Thailand, with low patient numbers from Africa and Latin America. Outcomes after surgery were commonly the focus (33 studies); very few large studies looked at access to surgical care or patient expenditure. The use of large data sets specifically to improve surgical outcomes in LMICs is currently limited.
Large volumes of data are becoming more common and provide a strong foundation for continuing investigation. Future studies should address questions more specific to surgery.Full text
You may also be interested in
Authors: T. J. Patterson, J. Beck, P. J. Currie, R. A. J. Spence, G. Spence
Authors: L. de Munter, S. Polinder, C. L. P. van de Ree, N. Kruithof, K. W. W. Lansink, E. W. Steyerberg et al.
Surgical removal of the index node marked using magnetic seed localization to assess response to neoadjuvant immunotherapy in patients with stage III melanoma.
Authors: B. Schermers, V. Franke, E. A. Rozeman, B. A. van de Wiel, A. Bruining, M. W. Wouters et al.
Nationwide observational study of mortality from complicated intra‐abdominal infections and the role of bacterial cultures.
Authors: A. Tsuchiya, H. Yasunaga, Y. Tsutsumi, T. Kawahara, H. Matsui, K. Fushimi et al.
Impact of enhanced recovery on oncological outcomes following minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer.
Authors: B. J. Quiram, J. Crippa, F. Grass, J. K. Lovely, K. T. Behm, D. T. Colibaseanu et al.
Prospective cohort study of ultrasound surveillance of regional lymph nodes in patients with intermediate‐risk cutaneous melanoma.
Authors: A. J. Hayes, E. Moskovic, K. O'Meara, H. G. Smith, R. J. E. Pope, J. Larkin et al.
Multicentre study of non‐surgical management of diverticulitis with abscess formation. BJS 2019; 106: 458-466.
Authors: D. P. V. Lambrichts, H. E. Bolkenstein, D. C. H. E. van der Does, D. Dieleman, R. M. P. H. Crolla, J. W. T. Dekker et al.
Authors: S. Biondo
Randomized clinical trial
Randomized clinical trial of selective decontamination of the digestive tract in elective colorectal cancer surgery (SELECT trial). BJS 2019; 106: 355-363.
Authors: G. S. A. Abis, H. B. A. C. Stockmann, H. J. Bonjer, N. van Veenendaal, M. L. M. van Doorn‐Schepens, A. E. Budding et al.
Authors: R. Miller, J. C. R. Wormald, R. G. Wade, D. P. Collins
Time to calcitonin normalization after surgery for node‐negative and node‐positive medullary thyroid cancer. BJS 2019; 106: 412-418.
Authors: A. Machens, K. Lorenz, H. Dralle
Notes: Sensitive as prognostic tool