Truncal varicose vein diameter and patient‐reported outcome measures.
Published: 2nd August 2017
Authors: T. R. A. Lane, L. Varatharajan, F. Fiorentino, A. C. Shepherd, L. Zimmo, M. S. Gohel et al.
Varicose veins and chronic venous disease are common, and some funding bodies ration treatment based on a minimum diameter of the incompetent truncal vein. This study assessed the effect of maximum vein diameter on clinical status and patient symptoms.
A prospective observational cohort study of patients presenting with symptomatic varicose veins to a tertiary referral public hospital vascular clinic between January 2011 and July 2012. Patients underwent standardized assessment with venous duplex ultrasonography, and completed questionnaires assessing quality of life (
Some 330 patients were assessed before surgery. The median maximum vein diameter was 7·0 (i.q.r. 5·3–9·2) mm overall, 7·9 (6·0–9·8) mm for great saphenous vein and 6·0 (5·2–8·9) mm for small saphenous vein. In linear regression analysis, vein diameter was shown to have a significant association with
Incompetent truncal vein diameter was associated with increasing
You may also be interested in
Meta‐analysis of the costs of carotid artery stenting and carotid endarterectomy. BJS 2017; 104: 1284-1292.
Authors: E. E. de Vries, V. G. M. Baldew, H. M. den Ruijter, G. J. de Borst
Systematic review of patient‐reported outcome measures in patients with varicose veins. BJS 2017; 104: 1424-1432.
Authors: A. Aber, E. Poku, P. Phillips, M. Essat, H. Buckley Woods, S. Palfreyman et al.
Notes: AVVQ and SF‐36 good options
Authors: D. A. Sidloff, A. Saratzis, M. J. Sweeting, J. Michaels, J. T. Powell, S. G. Thompson et al.
Notes: Mortality double in women
Time‐dependent trends in cardiovascular adverse events during follow‐up after carotid or iliofemoral endarterectomy. BJS 2017; 104: 1477-1485.
Authors: I. D. van Koeverden, S. T. W. van Haelst, S. Haitjema, J.‐P. P. M. de Vries, F. L. Moll, H. M. den Ruijter et al.
Notes: No decline in events
Association between metformin prescription and growth rates of abdominal aortic aneurysms. BJS 2017; 104: 1486-1493.
Authors: J. Golledge, J. Moxon, J. Pinchbeck, G. Anderson, S. Rowbotham, J. Jenkins et al.
Notes: Worth an RCT
Systematic review of carotid artery procedures and the volume–outcome relationship in Europe. BJS 2017; 104: 1273-1283.
Authors: P. Phillips, E. Poku, M. Essat, H. B. Woods, E. A. Goka, E. C. Kaltenthaler et al.
Notes: More justification for higher‐volume centres
Systematic review of mortality risk prediction models in the era of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery. BJS 2017; 104: 964-976.
Authors: N. Lijftogt, T. W. F. Luijnenburg, A. C. Vahl, E. D. Wilschut, V. J. Leijdekkers, M. F. Fiocco et al.
Notes: No more please
Long‐term follow‐up of fenestrated endovascular repair for juxtarenal aortic aneurysm. BJS 2017; 104: 1020-1027.
Authors: I. N. Roy, A. M. Millen, S. M. Jones, S. R. Vallabhaneni, J. R. H. Scurr, R. G. McWilliams et al.
Notes: Prevents aneurysm rupture
Endophlebectomy of the common femoral vein and arteriovenous fistula creation as adjuncts to venous stenting for post‐thrombotic syndrome. BJS 2017; 104: 718-725.
Authors: M. A. F. de Wolf, H. Jalaie, J. H. H. van Laanen, R. L. M. Kurstjens, M. J. S. Mensinck, M. J. de Geus et al.
Notes: Two‐thirds improve
Randomized clinical trial
Randomized clinical trial of comprehensive geriatric assessment and optimization in vascular surgery. BJS 2017; 104: 679-687.
Authors: J. S. L. Partridge, D. Harari, F. C. Martin, J. L. Peacock, R. Bell, A. Mohammed et al.
Notes: Better outcomes
Meta‐analysis of individual‐patient data from EVAR‐1, DREAM, OVER and ACE trials comparing outcomes of endovascular or open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm over 5 years. BJS 2017; 104: 166-178.
Authors: J. T. Powell, M. J. Sweeting, P. Ulug, J. D. Blankensteijn, F. A. Lederle, J.‐P. Becquemin et al.
Notes: Survival comparable