Using textbook outcome as a measure of quality of care in oesophagogastric cancer surgery. BJS 2018; 105: 561-569.
Published: 21st February 2018
Authors: R. T. van der Kaaij, M. V. de Rooij, F. van Coevorden, F. E. M. Voncken, P. Snaebjornsson, H. Boot et al.
Textbook outcome is a multidimensional measure representing an ideal course after oesophagogastric cancer surgery. It comprises ten perioperative quality‐of‐care parameters and has been developed recently using population‐based data. Its association with long‐term outcome is unknown. The objectives of this study were to validate the clinical relevance of textbook outcome at a hospital level, and to assess its relation with long‐term survival after treatment for oesophagogastric cancer.
All patients with oesophageal or gastric cancer scheduled for surgery with curative intent between January 2009 and June 2015 were selected from an institutional database. A Cox model was used to study the association between textbook outcome and survival.
A textbook outcome was achieved in 58 of 144 patients (40·3 per cent) with oesophageal cancer and in 48 of 105 (45·7 per cent) with gastric cancer. Factors associated with not achieving a textbook outcome were failure to achieve a lymph node yield of at least 15 (after oesophagectomy) and postoperative complications of grade II or more. After oesophagectomy, median overall survival was longer for patients with a textbook outcome than for patients without (median not reached
Textbook outcome is a clinically relevant measure in patients undergoing oesophagogastric cancer surgery as it can identify underperforming parameters in a hospital setting. Overall survival in patients with a textbook outcome is better than in patients without a textbook outcome.Full text
You may also be interested in
Authors: M. A. Amer, M. D. Smith, C. H. Khoo, G. P. Herbison, J. L. McCall
Meta‐analysis of prognostic factors for overall survival in patients with resected hilar cholangiocarcinoma.
Authors: N. T. E. Bird, A. McKenna, J. Dodd, G. Poston, R. Jones, H. Malik et al.
Notes: Tumour biology is important
Randomized clinical trial
Multicentre factorial randomized clinical trial of perioperative immunonutrition versus standard nutrition for patients undergoing surgical resection of oesophageal cancer.
Authors: L. A. Mudge, D. I. Watson, B. M. Smithers, E. A. Isenring, L. Smith, G. G. Jamieson et al.
Notes: No difference
Detection of carcinoembryonic antigen in peritoneal fluid of patients undergoing laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with complete mesogastric excision.
Authors: D. Xie, Y. Wang, J. Shen, J. Hu, P. Yin, J. Gong et al.
Notes: Careful surgery, fewer free cancer cells
Authors: B. J. Noordman, E. W. de Bekker‐Grob, P. P. L. O. Coene, E. van der Harst, S. M. Lagarde, J. Shapiro et al.
Notes: Organ preservation preferred
Authors: M. T. Adil, V. Jain, F. Rashid, O. Al‐taan, D. Whitelaw, P. Jambulingam et al.
Notes: Bariatric surgery improves physical function
Authors: B.‐H. Min, M. Hong, J. H. Lee, P.‐L. Rhee, T. S. Sohn, S. Kim et al.
Predictive value of abdominal CT in evaluating internal herniation after bariatric laparoscopic Roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass.
Authors: J. C. Ederveen, M. M. G. van Berckel, S. W. Nienhuijs, R. J. P. Weber, J. Nederend
Notes: Important tool for correct diagnosis
Nomogram to predict lymph node metastasis in patients with early oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Authors: H. Zheng, H. Tang, H. Wang, Y. Fang, Y. Shen, M. Feng et al.
Notes: Selecting patients for surgery or endoscopic treatment
Authors: M. Kanda, D. Shimizu, H. Tanaka, C. Tanaka, D. Kobayashi, M. Hayashi et al.
Notes: Potential target for therapy
Development and validation of a difficulty score to predict intraoperative complications during laparoscopic liver resection. BJS 2018; 105: 1182-1191.
Authors: M. C. Halls, G. Berardi, F. Cipriani, L. Barkhatov, P. Lainas, S. Harris et al.
Notes: Helps improve selection for laparoscopic liver resection