Validation of the Bluebelle Wound Healing Questionnaire for assessment of surgical‐site infection in closed primary wounds after hospital discharge. BJS 2019; 106: 226-235.
Published: 17th December 2018
Authors: Rhiannon Macefield, Jane Blazeby, Barnaby Reeves, Sara Brookes, Kerry Avery, Chris Rogers et al.
Accurate assessment of surgical‐site infection (SSI) is crucial for surveillance and research. Self‐reporting patient measures are needed because current SSI tools are limited for assessing patients after leaving hospital. The Bluebelle Wound Healing Questionnaire (WHQ) was developed for patient or observer completion; this study tested its acceptability, scale structure, reliability and validity in patients with closed primary wounds after abdominal surgery.
Patients completed the WHQ (self‐assessment) within 30 days after leaving hospital and returned it by post. Healthcare professionals completed the WHQ (observer assessment) by telephone or face‐to‐face. Questionnaire response rates and patient acceptability were assessed. Factor analysis and Cronbach's α examined scale structure and internal consistency. Test–retest and self‐ versus observer reliability assessments were performed. Sensitivity and specificity for SSI discrimination against a face‐to‐face reference diagnosis (using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria) were examined.
Some 561 of 792 self‐assessments (70·8 per cent) and 597 of 791 observer assessments (75·5 per cent) were completed, with few missing data or problems reported. Data supported a single‐scale structure with strong internal consistency (α greater than 0·8). Reliability between test–retest and self‐ versus observer assessments was good (κ 0·6 or above for the majority of items). Sensitivity and specificity for SSI discrimination was high (area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve 0·91).
The Bluebelle WHQ is acceptable, reliable and valid with a single‐scale structure for postdischarge patient or observer assessment of SSI in closed primary wounds.Full text
You may also be interested in
Randomized clinical trial
Randomized clinical trial of open suture repair versus totally extraperitoneal repair for treatment of sportsman’s hernia. BJS 2019; 106: 837-844.
Authors: A. J. Sheen, A. Montgomery, T. Simon, I. Ilves, H. Paajanen
Randomized clinical trial
Randomized clinical trial comparing total extraperitoneal with Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair (TEPLICH trial). BJS 2019; 106: 845-855.
Authors: N. Gutlic, A. Gutlic, U. Petersson, P. Rogmark, A. Montgomery
Authors: I. R. Daniels, N. J. Smart
Authors: A. S. H. M. van Dalen, J. Legemaate, W. S. Schlack, D. A. Legemate, M. P. Schijven
Authors: R. L. Harries, J. Glasbey, V. J. Gokani, G. Griffiths, W. Allum
Authors: K. Fairhurst, J. M. Blazeby, S. Potter, C. Gamble, C. Rowlands, K. N. L. Avery et al.
Incidence and lifetime risk of hospitalization and surgery for diverticular disease. BJS 2019; 106: 930-939.
Authors: F. Sköldberg, J. Granlund, A. Discacciati, F. Hjern, P. T. Schmidt, O. Olén et al.
Predicting recurrence of papillary thyroid cancer using the eighth edition of the AJCC/UICC staging system. BJS 2019; 106: 889-897.
Authors: N. Chereau, T. O. Oyekunle, A. Zambeli‐Ljepović, H. S. Kazaure, S. A. Roman, F. Menegaux et al.
Long‐term results from a randomized comparison of open transinguinal preperitoneal hernia repair and the Lichtenstein method (TULIP trial). BJS 2019; 106: 856-861.
Authors: W. J. V. Bökkerink, G. G. Koning, D. Malagic, L. Hout, C. J. H. M. Laarhoven, P. W. H. E. Vriens et al.
Authors: G. Ramsay, A. B. Haynes, S. R. Lipsitz, I. Solsky, J. Leitch, A. A. Gawande et al.