Validation of two prognostic models for recurrence and survival after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. BJS 2017; 104: 1235-1243.
Published: 10th May 2017
Authors: M. Bencivenga, G. Verlato, D.‐S. Han, D. Marrelli, F. Roviello, H.‐K. Yang et al.
Prognostic models from Korea and Italy have been developed that predict overall survival and cancer recurrence respectively after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. The aim of this study was to validate the two models in independent patient cohorts, and to evaluate which factors may explain differences in prognosis between Korean and Italian patients with gastric cancer.
Patients who underwent radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer between January 2000 and December 2004 at Seoul National University Hospital and at eight centres in Italy were included. Discrimination of the models was tested with receiver operating characteristic (
Some 2867 and 940 patients from Korea and Italy respectively were included. The Korean nomogram achieved good discrimination in the Italian cohort (
Both prognostic models performed fairly well in independent patient cohorts. Differences in recurrence rates of gastric cancer may be partially explained by ethnicity.Read more
You may also be interested in
Comparison of gaze behaviour of trainee and experienced surgeons during laparoscopic gastric bypass.
Authors: S. Erridge, H. Ashraf, S. Purkayastha, A. Darzi, M. H. Sodergren
Notes: Potential uses in training and assessment
Impact of weight loss and eating difficulties on health‐related quality of life up to 10 years after oesophagectomy for cancer.
Authors: P. Anandavadivelan, A. Wikman, A. Johar, P. Lagergren
Notes: Associated with deterioration of HRQOL
Influence of national centralization of oesophagogastric cancer on management and clinical outcome from emergency upper gastrointestinal conditions.
Authors: S. R. Markar, H. Mackenzie, T. Wiggins, A. Askari, A. Karthikesalingam, O. Faiz et al.
Notes: Improves outcome of oesophageal perforation
Meta‐analysis of microsatellite instability in relation to clinicopathological characteristics and overall survival in gastric cancer.
Authors: K. Polom, L. Marano, D. Marrelli, R. De Luca, G. Roviello, V. Savelli et al.
Notes: Microsatellite instability subgroup does better
Authors: V. Wanjura, E. Szabo, J. Österberg, J. Ottosson, L. Enochsson, G. Sandblom et al.
Notes: Avoid unnecessary surgery
Authors: J. Deng, J. Guo, G. Ma, H. Zhang, D. Sun, Y. Hou et al.
Notes: Identifies a poor prognosis group
Meta‐analysis of the impact of surgical approach on the grade of mesorectal excision in rectal cancer. BJS 2017; 104: 1609-1619.
Authors: B. Creavin, M. E. Kelly, E. Ryan, D. C. Winter
Notes: Open excision provides better‐quality mesorectum
Multicentre cohort study to define and validate pathological assessment of response to neoadjuvant therapy in oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma. BJS 2017; 104: 1816-1828.
Authors: F. Noble, M. A. Lloyd, R. Turkington, E. Griffiths, M. O'Donovan, J. R. O'Neill et al.
Notes: Response associated with survival
Authors: P. Probst, S. Ohmann, U. Klaiber, F. J. Hüttner, A. T. Billeter, A. Ulrich et al.
Notes: Publication bias likely
Randomized clinical trial
Double‐blind randomized clinical trial of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy versus radiologically inserted gastrostomy in children. BJS 2017; 104: 1620-1627.
Authors: R. R. Singh, S. A. Nah, D. J. Roebuck, S. Eaton, A. Pierro, J. I. Curry et al.
Notes: No difference in the number or magnitude of complications
Weekend admission and mortality for gastrointestinal disorders across England and Wales. BJS 2017; 104: 1723-1734.
Authors: S. E. Roberts, T. H. Brown, K. Thorne, R. A. Lyons, A. Akbari, D. J. Napier et al.
Notes: Worst for gastrointestinal cancer and liver disease
Use of endoscopy to determine the resection margin during laparoscopic gastrectomy for cancer. BJS 2017; 104: 1829-1836.
Authors: S. Kawakatsu, M. Ohashi, N. Hiki, S. Nunobe, M. Nagino, T. Sano et al.