Authors: E. Botteri, P. Veronesi, J. Vila, N. Rotmensz, V. Galimberti, M. V. Thomazini et al.
Notes: Molecular subtype matters more
Authors: L. Dihge, P.‐O. Bendahl, L. Rydén
Notes: Defines need for staging?
Authors: R. V. Dave, R. Millican‐Slater, D. Dodwell, K. Horgan, N. Sharma
Notes: Mid‐neoadjuvant chemotherapy MRI useful
Combined PET–CT and axillary lymph node marking with radioactive iodine seeds (MARI procedure) for tailored axillary treatment in node‐positive breast cancer after neoadjuvant therapy. BJS 2017; 104: 1188-1196.
Authors: B. B. Koolen, M. Donker, M. E. Straver, M. E. M. van der Noordaa, E. J. T. Rutgers, R. A. Valdés Olmos et al.
Notes: Reduced axillary lymph node dissection rates
Quality of life after mastectomy with or without immediate breast reconstruction. BJS 2017; 104: 1197-1206.
Authors: J. Dauplat, F. Kwiatkowski, P. Rouanet, E. Delay, K. Clough, J. L. Verhaeghe et al.
Notes: Good for the appropriate patient
Authors: C. Liedtke, H.‐C. Kolberg
Association between age and access to immediate breast reconstruction in women undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer. BJS 2017; 104: 555-561.
Authors: R. Jeevan, J. P. Browne, C. Gulliver‐Clarke, J. Pereira, C. M. Caddy, J. H. P. van der Meulen et al.
Notes: Age should not matter
Ten‐year report on axillary recurrence after negative sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer from the Swedish Multicentre Cohort Study. BJS 2017; 104: n/a-n/a.
Authors: J. de Boniface, J. Frisell, L. Bergkvist, Y. Andersson
Notes: Axillary recurrences rare
Authors: K.‐T. Lee, S. I. Bang, J.‐K. Pyon, J. H. Hwang, G.‐H. Mun
Notes: Implants increase risk
Meta‐analysis of sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer using the magnetic technique. BJS 2016; 103: 1409-1419.
Authors: A. Zada, M. C. L. Peek, M. Ahmed, B. Anninga, R. Baker, M. Kusakabe et al.
Notes: Both work
Authors: J. Brandt, S. Borgquist, M. Almquist, J. Manjer
Notes: Hypothyroidism reduces survival
Authors: M. Ahmed, R. Baker, I. T. Rubio
Notes: Sentinel node biopsy feasible in most cases
National study of the impact of patient information and involvement in decision‐making on immediate breast reconstruction rates. BJS 2016; 103: 1640-1648.
Authors: A. Frisell, J. Lagergren, J. Boniface
Notes: Information is key
Authors: J. R. Benson, Z. E. Winters
Authors: Z. Rayter, S. Wilson
National trends and regional variation in immediate breast reconstruction rates. BJS 2016; 103: 1147-1156.
Authors: R. Jeevan, J. C. Mennie, P. N. Mohanna, J. M. O'Donoghue, R. M. Rainsbury, D. A. Cromwell et al.
Notes: Immediate reconstruction on the rise
Association between underestimation of tumour size by imaging and incomplete excision in breast‐conserving surgery for breast cancer. BJS 2016; 103: 830-838.
Authors: J. M. Dixon, C. Newlands, C. Dodds, J. Thomas, L. J. Williams, I. H. Kunkler et al.
Notes: Current imaging has limitations