Circular stapling versus triangulating stapling for the cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy in patients with thoracic esophageal cancer: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Surgery 2017; 162: 131-138.
Published: 5th April 2018
Authors: Hayata K, Nakamori M, Nakamura M, Ojima T, Iwahashi M, Katsuda M et al.
Use of the triangulating method of stapling did not reduce the risk of anastomotic stricture compared with circular stapling: 19 versus 17per cent, respectively, (P=0.935) in this study that included 100 procedures.Pubmed Link
You may also be interested in
Authors: Mariette C, Markar SR, Dabakuyo-Yonli TS, Meunier B, Pezet D, Collet D et al.
Early oral feeding following McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy: an open-label, randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial. Ann Surg 2018; 267: 435-442.
Authors: Sun H-B, Li Y, Liu X-B, Zhang R-X, Wang Z-F, Lerut T et al.
Minimally invasive versus open esophageal resection: three-year follow-up of the previously reported randomized controlled trial: The TIME Trial. Ann Surg 2017; 266: 232-236.
Authors: Straatman J, van der Wielen N, Cuesta MA, Daams F, Roig Garcia J, Bonavina L et al.
A randomized controlled trial comparing antioxidant-enriched enteral nutrition with immune-enhancing enteral nutrition after esophagectomy for cancer. Surg Today 2013; 43: 1240-1249.
Authors: Nagano T, Fujita H, Tanaka T, Matono S, Murata K, Ishibashi N et al. et al.
A prospective randomized controlled trial of semi-mechanical versus hand-sewn or circular stapled esophagogastrostomy for prevention of anastomotic stricture. World J Surg 2013; 37: 1043-1050.
Authors: Wang WP, Gao Q, Wang KN, Shi H, Chen LQ
Effect of short-term versus prolonged nasogastric decompression on major post-esophagectomy complications. A parallel-group, randomized trial. Arch Surg 2012; 147: 747-751.
Authors: Misty RC, Vijayabhaskar R, Karimundackal G, Jiwnani S, Pramesh CS
Hand-sewn versus mechanical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2013; 257: 238–248.
Authors: Honda M, Kuriyama A, Noma H, Nunobe S, Furukawa T
Impact of perioperative administration of synbiotics in patients with esophageal cancer undergoing esophagectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Surgery 2012; 152: 832–842.
Authors: Tanaka K, Yano M, Motoori M, Kishi K, Miyashiro I, Ohue M et al. et al.
Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2012; 379: 1887-1892.
Authors: Biere SS, Henegouwen MIVB, Maas KW, Bonavina L, Rosman C, Garcia JR et al. et al.
End-to-end versus end-to-side esophagogastrostomy after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective randomized study. Ann Surg 2011; 254: 226-233.
Authors: Nederlof N, Tilanus H, Tran TCK, Hop WCJ, Wijnhoven B, de Jonge J. et al.
Cervical or thoracic anastomosis after esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Surg 2011; 28: 29–35.
Authors: Biere SSAY, Maas KW, Cuesta MA, van der Peet DL.
Impact of proton pump inhibitors on benign anastomotic stricture formations after esophagectomy and gastric tube reconstruction: results from a randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg 2009; 250: 667-673.
Authors: Johansson J, Oberg S, Wenner J, Zilling T, Johnsson F, von Holstein CS et al. et al.