Hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. N Engl J Med 2019; 380: 152-162.
Published: 22nd March 2019
Authors: Mariette C, Markar SR, Dabakuyo-Yonli TS, Meunier B, Pezet D, Collet D et al.
Minimally invasive surgery reduced the rate of major postoperative complications (mostly pulmonary) from 64 to 36 per cent (P<0.001), and improved overall three year survival from 55 to 67 per cent in this study that included 207 procedures.Pubmed Link
You may also be interested in
Early oral feeding following McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy: an open-label, randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial. Ann Surg 2018; 267: 435-442.
Authors: Sun H-B, Li Y, Liu X-B, Zhang R-X, Wang Z-F, Lerut T et al.
Circular stapling versus triangulating stapling for the cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy in patients with thoracic esophageal cancer: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Surgery 2017; 162: 131-138.
Authors: Hayata K, Nakamori M, Nakamura M, Ojima T, Iwahashi M, Katsuda M et al.
Minimally invasive versus open esophageal resection: three-year follow-up of the previously reported randomized controlled trial: The TIME Trial. Ann Surg 2017; 266: 232-236.
Authors: Straatman J, van der Wielen N, Cuesta MA, Daams F, Roig Garcia J, Bonavina L et al.
A randomized controlled trial comparing antioxidant-enriched enteral nutrition with immune-enhancing enteral nutrition after esophagectomy for cancer. Surg Today 2013; 43: 1240-1249.
Authors: Nagano T, Fujita H, Tanaka T, Matono S, Murata K, Ishibashi N et al. et al.
A prospective randomized controlled trial of semi-mechanical versus hand-sewn or circular stapled esophagogastrostomy for prevention of anastomotic stricture. World J Surg 2013; 37: 1043-1050.
Authors: Wang WP, Gao Q, Wang KN, Shi H, Chen LQ
Effect of short-term versus prolonged nasogastric decompression on major post-esophagectomy complications. A parallel-group, randomized trial. Arch Surg 2012; 147: 747-751.
Authors: Misty RC, Vijayabhaskar R, Karimundackal G, Jiwnani S, Pramesh CS
Hand-sewn versus mechanical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2013; 257: 238–248.
Authors: Honda M, Kuriyama A, Noma H, Nunobe S, Furukawa T
Impact of perioperative administration of synbiotics in patients with esophageal cancer undergoing esophagectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Surgery 2012; 152: 832–842.
Authors: Tanaka K, Yano M, Motoori M, Kishi K, Miyashiro I, Ohue M et al. et al.
Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2012; 379: 1887-1892.
Authors: Biere SS, Henegouwen MIVB, Maas KW, Bonavina L, Rosman C, Garcia JR et al. et al.
End-to-end versus end-to-side esophagogastrostomy after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective randomized study. Ann Surg 2011; 254: 226-233.
Authors: Nederlof N, Tilanus H, Tran TCK, Hop WCJ, Wijnhoven B, de Jonge J. et al.
Cervical or thoracic anastomosis after esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Surg 2011; 28: 29–35.
Authors: Biere SSAY, Maas KW, Cuesta MA, van der Peet DL.
Impact of proton pump inhibitors on benign anastomotic stricture formations after esophagectomy and gastric tube reconstruction: results from a randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg 2009; 250: 667-673.
Authors: Johansson J, Oberg S, Wenner J, Zilling T, Johnsson F, von Holstein CS et al. et al.