Laparoscopic versus open resection for rectal cancer. A non-inferiority meta-analysis of quality of surgical resection outcomes. Ann Surg 2019; 269: 849-855.
Published: 2nd September 2019
Authors: Acuna SA, Chesney TR, Ramjist JK, Shah PS, Kennedy ED, Naxter NN et al.
Fourteen RCTs were analyzed. No differences were found between open and laparoscopic surgery in the quality of the surgical resections.Pubmed Link
You may also be interested in
Low ligation of inferior mesenteric artery in laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer reduces genitourinary dysfunction. Results from a randomized controlled trial (HIGHLOW Trial). Ann Surg 2019; 269: 1018-1024.
Authors: Mari G, Crippa J, Cocozza E, Berselli M, Livraghi L, Carzaniga P et al.
Clinical outcome after rectal replacement with side-to-end, colon-J-pouch, or straight colorectal anastomosis following total mesorectal excision. A Swiss Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Trial (SAKK 40/04). Ann Surg 2019; 269: 827-835.
Authors: Marti W, Curti G, Wehrli H, Grieder F, Graf M, Gloor B et al.
Better function with a colonic J-pouch or a side-to-end anastomosis? A randomized controlled trial to compare the complications, functional outcome, and quality of life in patients with low rectal cancer after a J-pouch or a side-to-end anastomosis. Ann Surg 2019; 269: 815-826.
Authors: Parc Y, Ruppert R, Fuerst A, Golcher H, Zutshi M, Hull T et al.
A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the use of suction drains following rectal surgery. Dig Surg 2018; 35: 482–490.
Authors: Guerra F, Giuliani G, Coletta D, Boni M, Rondelli F, Bianchi PP et al.
Robotic versus laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg 2018; 267: 1034-1046.
Authors: Prete FP, Pezzolla A, Prete F, Testini M, Marzaioli R, Patriti A et al.
Tattooing improves the detection of small lymph nodes and increases the number of retrieved lymph nodes in patients with rectal cancer who receive preoperative chemoradiotherapy: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Am J Surg 2018; 215: 563-569.
Authors: Okada K, Sahahiro S, Ogimi T, Miyakita H, Saito G, Tanaka A et al.
Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a phase II open label prospective randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2018; 267: 243-251.
Authors: Kim MJ, Park SC, Park JW, Chang HJ, Kim DY, Nam B-H et al.
Effect of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery on risk of conversion to open laparotomy among patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer. The ROLARR randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2017; 318: 1569-1580.
Authors: Jayne D, Pigazzi A, Marshall H, Croft J, Corrigan N, Copeland J et al.
Biological mesh closure of the pelvic floor after extralevator abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer; a multicenter randomized controlled trial (the BIOPEX study). Ann Surg 2017; 265: 1074-1081.
Authors: Musters G, Klaver CE, Bosker RJI, Burger JWA, van Duijvendijk P, van Etten B et al.
Biological mesh closure of the pelvic floor after extralevator abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer: a multicenter randomized controlled trial (the BIOPEX-study). Ann Surg 2017; 265: 1074-1081.
Authors: Musters G, Klaver CEL, Bosker R, Burger J, van Duijvendijk P, van Etten B et al.
To drain or not to drain infraperitoneal anastomosis after rectal excision for cancer: The GRECCAR 5 randomized trial. Ann Surg 2017; 265: 474-480.
Authors: Denost Q, Rouanet P, Faucheron J-L, Panis Y, Meunier B, Cotte E et al.
Male sexual dysfunction after rectal cancer surgery: results of a randomized trial comparing mesorectal excision with and without lateral lymph node dissection for patients with lower rectal cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0212. Eur J Surg Oncol 2016; 42: 1851–1858.
Authors: Saito S, Fujita S, Mizusawa J, Kanemitsu Y, Saito N, Kinugasa Y et al.